Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 28652 (AP)

JARUGU SREENIVASULU REDDY v. BUCHANNGARI SUJATHA

CRP/401/2026 · 2026-02-03

Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

Original Suitbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC011358402014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] WEDNESDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 401 OF 2026 Between: 1. JARUGU SREENIVASULU REDDY, - ...PETITIONER AND 1. BUCHANNGARI SUJATHA, - ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased toCivil Revision Petition challenging the aorder passed in O.E.A.No.4 of 2010 in O.S.No.39 of 2004, dt.02.08.2013 passed by the Hon'ble Senior Civil judge, Punganur, Chitoor Dist. IA NO: 1 OF 2014(CRPMP 612 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased condone the delay of 63 days in filing the present CRP. IA NO: 3 OF 2014(CRPMP 2077 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased IA NO: 6 OF 2014(CRPMP 2081 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K RATHANGA PANI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent: 1. N PRAMOD The Court made the following ORAL ORDER: Sri M. Johnson Kumar, Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri K. Rathanga Pani Reddy, Ld. Counsel for the Petitioner, on instructions, submits that this Civil Revision Petition has become infructuous. 2. Having so recorded, this Civil Revision Petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. No order as to costs. 3. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. _________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 04.02.2026 Mnr 121 HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 401 OF 2026 Dt: 04.02.2026 Mnr