Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 28651 (AP)

Jamshedpur Utilities and Services Company Limited v. Shri K S Subba Rao

CC/3459/2018 · 2026-02-11

Ninala Jayasurya

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010946512018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3209] THURSDAY,THE TWELFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3459/2018 Between: 1. JAMSHEDPUR UTILITIES AND SERVICES COMPANY LIMITED,, A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956, HAVING REGISTERED OFFICE AT SAKCHI BOULEVARD ROAD, NORTHERN TOWN, BISTUPUR, JAMSHEDPUR - 831 001, JHARKHAND WITH ITS WATER SERVICES DIVISION TUMMALAPALLE PROJECT AT DOOR NO.4- 11-112, NEAR SUJATHA THEATRE PULIVENDULA YSR KADAPA DISTRICT, PRESENTLY BY ITS CHIEFFINANCIAL OFFICER - MR. INDRAJIT ROY ...PETITIONER AND 1. SHRI K S SUBBA RAO, Occ The Deputy Commissioner of Labour Kadapa, YSR Kadapa District, Andhra Pradesh ...CONTEMNOR Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the Respondents invoking the powers under the provisions of 2 NJS,J C.C.NO.3459 OF 2018 Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for wilful and deliberate disobedience of the interim Orders of this Hon'ble Court dated 10/11/2011 passed in WPMP No.36773 of 2011 in WP No.29689 of 2011 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To grant leave to the Petitioner/Petitioner to file the Contempt Case against the Respondents/Respondents 4 to 8 under Sections 10 to 12 more particularly the provisions of Sub-sections 4 and 5 of Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to initiate the present contempt proceedings against them and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To forthwith restrain the Respondents their agents, henchmen or anybody claiming through them, from depositing the sum of Rs.0.66 Crores towards the 1% Labour Cess amount so deducted from the gross value of its 34th & Final RA bill amounts, for the works done pertaining to the Agreement dated 04/08/2008 awarded to the Petitioner and release the said amounts immediately and to comply/implement the interim Orders of this Hon'ble Court dated 10/11/2011 passed in WPMP No.36773 of 2011 in WP No.29689 of 2011, pending disposal of the main Contempt Case and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. G V S GANESH Counsel for the Contemnor: 1. A SARVESWAR RAO 3 NJS,J C.C.NO.3459 OF 2018 The Court made the following ORDER: Mr.G.V.S.Ganesh, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that, in view of the subsequent developments in the contempt case, the cause does not survive for adjudication. 2. Recording the said submission, the contempt case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall also stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA 12.02.2026 LSP