1 CGHC010271502026 2026:CGHC:31382-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 1903 of 2026 Chitra Pamnani W/o Dr. Rajesh Dhruv Aged About 41 Years R/o Mahavir Nagar, Opposite Rajendra Park, Police Station Rajendra Nagar, Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station Rajendra Nagar, Distt.- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Dr. Rajesh Dhruv S/o Late C.R. Dhruv Aged About 45 Years R/o House No. 1, District Hospital Campus, Dantewada, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Petitioner : Ms. Unnati Sinha, Advocate For Respondent No.1 /State : Mr. S.S. Baghel, Govt. Advocate ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Mr. Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Mr. Ravindra Kumar Agrawal , Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 23.07.2026 1. Heard Ms. Unnati Sinha, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. S.S. Baghel, learned Government Advocate, appearing for the State/respondent No.1. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 with the following prayers :- ROHIT KUMAR CHANDRA Digitally signed by ROHIT KUMAR CHANDRA 2 “It is therefore, prayed that this Hon’ble Court may allow the application and also be pleased to Stay the arrest of petitioner in Crime No. 190/2025 registered at Police Station Rajendra Nagar, District Raipur (C.G.), in the interest of justice.” 3. From perusal of the prayers and pleadings made in the instant petition, it transpires that though the petitioner has prayed to stay the arrest of petitioner in Crime No. 190/2025 registered at Police Station Rajendra Nagar, District Raipur (C.G.), but has not mentioned the date of registration of impugned FIR and under what offence it has been registered, which goes to show that the prayer drafted by learned counsel for the petitioner is in a very casual manner and further wasted the precious time of the Court, as such, in the opinion of this Court, the prayer is defective one. 4. Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed on this ground alone with liberty to file afresh petition with appropriate prayer. 5. Certified copy of the documents annexed with this petition shall be returned to the counsel for the petitioner after retaining the photocopies of the same. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Chandra