APHC011112072004 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3397] MONDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA RAO APPEAL SUIT NO: 2657/2004 Between: 1. M/S ROADWIN TYRES (P) LTD, E.G. DISTRICT, REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR MANAGING DIRECTOR R/O PLOT NO.9, RAMANAYYAPETA, KAKINADA, E.G. DIST. ...APPELLANT AND 1. KOVVURI LAXMINARAYANA REDDY KAKINADA E G DISTRICT, S/o Venkata Reddy Business R/o 3-16-B12, Plot No.54, Postal Colony, Kakinada, E.G. District ...RESPONDENT IA NO: 1 OF 2004(ASMP 11994 OF 2004 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To grant stay of all further proceedings in pursuance of the Judgement and Decree dated 19/01/2004 in O.S.NO.106/1999 on the file of the Court of the I Addl. SCJ, Kakinada, pending disposal of the above appeal. IA NO: 4 OF 2004(ASMP 40913 OF 2004 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased IA NO: 1 OF 2006(ASMP 442 OF 2006 2 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to extend the time to deposit the amount as per the order dt. 23-08-04 in ASMP No. 11994/04 in AS No. 2657/04 on the file of thisHon'ble Court by 2 weeks from today Counsel for the Appellant: 1. . 2. VL N G K MURTHY Counsel for the Respondent: 1. N RAVI PRASAD 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA RAO APPEAL SUIT No.2657 of 2004 ORDER: As per the orders of this Court dated 02.03.2026, the Registry send a notice to the appellant to the address mentioned in the memorandum of appeal. The said notice was returned with an endorsement “insufficient address”. Therefore, the service held sufficient. None appeared for the appellant. 2. It seems that the appellant has no interest to prosecute the appeal. 3. Therefore, this Appeal Suit is dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE V. GOPALA KRISHNA RAO Date: 30.03.2026 MH 4 5 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V. GOPALA KRISHNA RAO 32 APPEAL SUIT No: 2657 of 2004 Date: 30.03.2026 MH 6