15.07.2026 Item No.23 Ct. No. 19 RP WPA/14053/2026 PANCHANAN DAS AND ANR. VS STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS. Mr. Sk. Rejaul Alam Mr. Subodh Ranjan Ray …For Petitioner Mr. Nilanjan Bhattacharjee, Sr. SC Ms. Jayita Dhar Chakraborty Mr. Nilanjan Pal Mr. Swapnomoy Sarkar …For State 1. Affidavit-of-service as filed on behalf of the petitioner is taken on record. 2. The writ petitioner and the respondent State are represented by their respective counsel. 3. None appears on behalf of the private respondents despite service. 4. At the time of hearing the learned advocate appearing on behalf of the writ petitioner submits before this Court that from page no.29 of the instant writ petition it would reveal that the respondent no.4 authority though initiated a demarcation process as would be evident from the memo dated 04.06.2026 but the said respondent 2 no.4 authority for the reason best known to him had not completed the demarcation process in respect of Mahammadpur G.P., Mouza- Tarachandbarh, J.L. No.205, Plot No.229, area-17 decimal. It is, thus, submitted that appropriate direction may be issued upon the respondent no.4 authority to complete the said demarcation process within a specified time and to submit a report with the appropriate authority, more specifically the respondent no.6 authority, so as to enable the respondent no.6 authority to initiate appropriate proceedings in the event anything adverse is found in the demarcation report. 5. Mr. Pal, learned advocate appearing on behalf of the respondent/State submits before this Court that the respondent no.4 authority may be directed to complete the demarcation process within a specified time. 3 6. Such being the position, this Court directs the respondent no.4 authority to complete the demarcation process in respect of Mahammadpur G.P., Mouza- Tarachandbarh, J.L. No.205, Plot No.229, area-17 decimal positively within thirty (30) working days from the date of communication of the server copy of today’s order after giving prior notice to the writ petitioner and the private respondents and/or any other stake holders and shall submit a demarcation report with the respondent no.6 authority. 7. The respondent no.6 authority is directed to consider the said demarcation report as would be submitted by the respondent no.4 authority in accordance with law and in the event he notice anything adverse in such demarcation report as would be submitted by the respondent no.4 authority he is directed to take all 4 consequential step in accordance with law forthwith. 8. With the aforementioned observations the instant writ petition is disposed of. 9. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be delivered to the learned advocates for the parties, upon compliance of all formalities. (PARTHA SARATHI SEN, J.)