APHC010897242017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] MONDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 5797/2017 Between: 1. S GANANAG @ P VIJAYA KUMAR, VISAKHAPATNAM, S/O RAMESH BABU, AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS, R/O FLAT NO.504, SRI GANESH SADAN APARTMENTS, NEAR GOKUL THEATRE, ALLIPURAM, VISAKHAPATNAM, PRESENTLY IN ABROAD, REP.BY HIS GPA HOLDER SMT. S.VIJAYA LAKSHMI. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SANNETI SATYAVATHI DIED 6 OTHERS, - 2. SANNETI LOKA NAGESWARA RAO, S/O LATE SANNAYIPATRUDU, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, R/O D.NO.9-64-80, BURADAVARI STREET, KOTHAPETA, VIJAYAWADA. 3. SANNETI RAMESH BABU, S/O LATE SANNAYIPATRUDU, ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/O FLAT NO.504, SRI GANESH SADAN APARTMENTS, NEAR GOKUL THEATRE, ALLIPURAM, VISAKHAPATNAM. 4. PILLA DWARAKI BAI, W/O SATYA HARI KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, R/O D.NO.21-10-3/ 14, PLOT NO.LF-1, BALAJI RESIDENCY, SRINAGAR COLONY, PT LANE, SATYANARAYANAPURAM, VIJAYAWADA. 5. PILLA BHARATHI DURGAMBA, W/O GANGA DHARMA RAO, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, C/O JALA USHA, POLICE CONSTABLE, 2ND FLOOR, OPP.CMR SHOPPING MALL, GOPALAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM. 6. SANNETI BHASKARA RANGA RAO, S/O LATE SSN PATRUDU, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, MARKETING EXECUTIVE, SONO VISION, OLD VINODA THEATRE, GOVERNERPET, VIJAYAWADA. 7. SANNETI SRINIVASA RAO, S/O LATE SSN PATRUDU, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/O D.NO.9-76-52, NEAR KOMALA VILAS, KOTHAPETA, VIJAYAWADA. RESPONDENTS 6 & 7 ARE NOT NECESSARY PARTIES TO THIS CRP 2 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased toaggrieved by the order and decree dated 4.10.2017 passed in I.A.No. 358 of 2017 in O.S.No. 346 of 2010 by the learned III Addl. Senior Civil Judge, Vijayawada, Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V S R ANJANEYALU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. The court made the following ORDER:- The instant civil revision petition has been filed by the revision petitioner/plaintiff challenging the order dated 04.10.2017 passed in I.A.No.358 of 2017 in O.S.No.346 of 2010 on the file of III Addl. Senior Civil Judge, Vijayawada. 2. When the matter is called, there is no representation on either side. 3. As per the E-courts status furnished by the Registry, the main suit itself was dismissed as not pressed on 23.01.2026, as the case was settled out of the court by the plaintiff. Hence, this Court is of the opinion that no further orders are required to be passed in the instant revision petition. 4. Therefore, the civil revision petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 02.03.2026 GVK 3 64 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.5797 of 2017 Date: 02.03.2026 GVK