Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 28639 (AP)

Ponnaganti Siva Nageswara Rao v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/45271/2018 · 2026-03-31

Sumathi Jagadam

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010936722018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] WEDNESDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION No.45271/2018 Between: 1. PONNAGANTI SIVA NAGESWARA RAO, S/O VENKATATESWARA RAO, HINDU, AGED 49 YEARS, OCC.CULTIVATION, R/O D.NO.3-11, CHINA NANDIGAMA, G. KONDURU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 2. PONNAGANTI RAMBABU, S/O VENKATATESWARA RAO, HINDU, AGED 52 YEARS, OCC.CULTIVATION, R/O D.NO.3- 11, CHINA NANDIGAMA, G.KONDURU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. PONNAGANTI SATYANARAYANA, S/O VENKATATESWARA RAO, HINDU, AGED 50 YEARS, OCC.CULTIVATION, R/O D.NO.3-11, CHINA NANDIGAMA, G.KONDURU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY IT'S PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DIST. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, G.KONDURU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of MANDAMUS, or any other appropriate writ or writs, declaring the action of the respondent No.2 to 4 in allotting the land of the petitioners Adm. Acs.9-29 Cents in Sy.No.188/1 land Adm.Ac.4-45 Cents, Sy.No.266/3 land Adm. Acs.2-76 Cents, Sy.No.277/1 land Adm. Acs.2.08 Cents, situated at Chinna Nandigama Village, G.Konduru Mandal, Krishna District, to the third parties, during the subsistence of the Status-quo orders passed in I.A.No.710/2018 in L.R.A.No.1/2018 dated.06-08-2018 is illegal, arbitrary and in violation of principles of natural justice. Consequently, direct the Respondent No. 4 not to allot the petitioners land to the third parties pending disposal of the appeal in L.R.A.No.1/2018 pending on the file of LRAT-Cum-11 Addl. District Judge, West Godavari, Eluru. IA No.1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No.4 not to allot the petitioners land to the third parties pending disposal of the appeal pending before LRAT-Cum-II Addl. District Judge, West Godavari, Eluru vide I.A.No.710/2018 in L.R.A.No.1/2018 daed.06- 08-2018, pending disposal of the Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. MUDDU VIJAY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) The Court made the following 3 ORDER: When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri Muddu Vijai, learned counsel for the petitioners, fairly submits that by virtue of the order, dated 24.02.2026, passed in L.R.A. No.1/2018 by the Chairman, L.R.A.T-cum-II Additional District Judge, West Godavari at Eluru, the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for consideration and the matter has become infructuous. Recording the aforesaid submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date:01.04.2026 DSH