Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 28638 (PNJ)

HARI CHAND @ HARSHU @ GANDHI v. STATE OF HARYANA

CRM-M/35124/2026 · 2026-07-08

Virinder Aggarwal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H ARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (217) CRM-M-35124-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision:-08.07.2026 HARI CHAND @ HARSHU @ GANDHI … Petitioner Versus STATE OF HARYANA ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIRINDER AGGARWAL Present: Mr. Varun Jain, Advocate with Mr. Arihant Jain, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Tanuj Sharma, AAG Haryana. **** VIRINDER AGGARWAL , J . (Oral) 1. After arguing for some time, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that he intends to withdraw the instant petition at this stage. 2. In view of this, the instant petition is dismissed as with- drawn at this stage. 3. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, are also dis- posed of. (VIRINDER AGGARWAL) 08th July, 2026 JUDGE Poonam Whether reasoned / speaking? Yes / No Whether reportable? Yes / No POONAM 2026.07.10 18:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document