Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 28631 (CHH)

INTIJAR CHOUDHARY v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/1894/2026 · 2026-07-21

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010280602026 2026:CGHC:31186 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 1894 of 2026 Intijar Choudhary S/o Alisher Aged About 30 Years R/o Village Asara, P.S. Ramala, District Bagpat (U.P.) Present Address- Rasoolpur, Ambikapur, P.S. And Tahsil Ambikapur District Surguja (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus State Of Chhattisgarh Through Police Station Manipur, District Surguja (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : None For Respondent/State : Ms. Ritika Verma, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice Order on Board 22.07.2026 1. This is an office reference. 2. This Court, vide order dated 07.08.2025 passed in MCRC No. 5200 of 2025, while allowing the bail of the petitioner, namely, Intijar Choudhary had expressed its trust that the trial Court would make an earnest endeavor to conclude the trial expeditiously in accordance with law, preferably within a period of six months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of that order, if there was no legal impediment. 3. Earlier on one occasion also this Court had granted extension of KUNAL DEWANGAN Digitally signed by KUNAL DEWANGAN 2 time for compliance of the order dated 07.08.2025. 4. The learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Ambikapur District- Surguja (C.G.) vide his request letter dated 06.07.2026 has requested for grant of six month’s additional time for concluding the trial. 5. It transpires from perusal of the P.U.D. that the evidence of the complainant, the Investigating Officer and the Panchnama witnesses are yet to be recorded. Thereafter, the statement of the accused is required to be recorded, followed by final hearing of the case. Owing to the pendency of these essential stages of the trial, the matter could not be concluded within the stipulated period. Accordingly, the learned trial Court has sought extension of time and has prayed for grant of a further period of six months for recording the remaining evidence, completing the subsequent stages of the trial and concluding the trial and final disposal of the case. 6. The request made by the learned trial Court, is allowed, however, instead of granting six months, this Court deems it appropriate to grant further 04 months time for concluding the trial from today. 7. Accordingly, this CRMP stands disposed off with the aforesaid direction. 8. Registry is directed to send a certified copy of this order to the trial Court concerned for necessary information and compliance. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Kunal