Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 28631 (AP)

G. Ramachandra Naidu v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/46398/2018 · 2026-02-23

Sumathi Jagadam

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010960062018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 46398/2018 Between: 1. G. RAMACHANDRA NAIDU, S/O. G. MUNASWAMY NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, R/O. OBULAIPALLI VILLAGE, SRIKALAHASTHI MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, STATE SECRETARIAT AT VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT AT CHITTOOR. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, TIRUPATI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, SRIKALAHASTI MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate writ, or order or direction, more particularly, one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 4th respondent in deleting the name of the petitioner in respect of the land admeasuring Ac.4-05 Cents in Sy. No. 49/3 situated at Obulaipalli Village, Srikalahasti Mandal, Chittoor district in pattadar and possessor columns of Pattadar Adangal/Pahani copy and form 1-B (ROR) without issuing any notice to the petitioner and without following the provision contained in Sec. 5 (3) of 2 The A.P. Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books, 1971 as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional being violative of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and also violative of Principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondent No. 4 herein to restore the name of the petitioner in the revenue records including the Pattadar Adangal/Pahani Copy and ROR 1-B Record in respect of land to an extent of Ac.4-05 Cents in Sy. No. 49/3, situated at Obulaipalli Village, Srikalahasti Mandal, Chittoor District belonging to the petitioner, in the interest of justice and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents herein to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 03-12-2018 and thereby direct the respondent No. 4 herein to restore the name of the petitioner in the revenue records including the Pattadar AdangaliPahani Copy and ROR 1-B Record in respect of land to an extent of Ac.4-05 Cents in Sy. No. 49/3, situated at Obulaipalli Village, Srikalahasti Mandal, Chittoor District belonging to the petitioner, pending disposal of the writ petition, in the interest of justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. T JANARDHAN RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 3 The Court made the following ORDER: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue. During the course of hearing, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue submitted that the respondents have considered and passed orders on the representation dated 03.12.2018 and questioning the same, the petitioner has preferred W.P.No.37605 of 2022. In view of the same, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 24.02.2026 KAS 4 134 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 46398/2018 Dated: 24.02.2026 KAS