Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 28630 (AP)

Ramisetty. Tarunkumar v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/37347/2018 · 2026-02-25

B V L N Chakravarthi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010767242018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No: 37347/2018 Between: 1. RAMISETTY. TARUNKUMAR, S/O.RAMISETTY. RAMA RAO, AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS, OCC. MEDICAL REPRESENTATIVE, R/O. SRINIVASA COLONY, VINUKONDA ROAD, NARASARAOPET, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, I TOWN POLICE STATION, NARASARAOPET, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, I TOWN POLICE, STATION, NARASARAOPET, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KONDAPALLI SYAM SUNDER Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: 2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.37347 OF 2018 ORDER: No one appeared for the writ petitioner either physically or through video conference, though the matter is posted under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Earlier also, there was no representation for the writ petitioner. 2. Sri R.Mallikharjuna Rao, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that investigation was completed and police laid report before the Magistrate referring the case as ‘mistake of fact’, and if the petitioner is aggrieved by the report filed by the police, he has to approach the Magistrate for necessary redressal in accordance with law. 3. It appears that the writ petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the writ petition. 4. In that view of the matter, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 26.02.2026 PSK 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 89 WRIT PETITION No:37347 OF 2018 Date: 26.02.2026 W PSK