Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 28619 (AP)

L.Rajesh v. The Inspector General of Police

WP/41725/2017 · 2026-01-07

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010943332017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] THURSDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 41725/2017 Between: L.rajesh, ...PETITIONER AND The Inspector General Of Police and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KIRTHI TEJA KONDAVEETI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA 2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 41725/2017 Order:- This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed for the following relief: “to issue a Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not disposing the appeal of the petitioner dt. 7-10-2017 made against the removal order in Proceedings No. P.VIII-6/207-EC-II-127 Bn dt. 20-9-2017 issued by the 5 th respondent is wholly illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently declare that the petitioner is entitled for disposal of the appeal dt. 7-10-2017 for reinstatement into service with all consequential benefits.” 2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri K.Narasimha Rao, learned counsel representing Sri K. Kirthi Teja, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in view of the subsequent events taken place in the lis, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for further adjudication, as the petitioner has been reinstated in the respondents corporation 3. Sri Josulu Bhaskar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents, is in attendance and has not disputed the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 3 4. Recording the said submissions made, the Writ Petition is closed. There shall be no orders as to costs. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. _____________________________ MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM,J 08.01.2026. Asr 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO.41725 of 2017 08.01.2026 Asr