Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 28612 (AP)

Smt. Vanajongi Lakshmi v. The Executive Officer

WP/14202/2014 · 2026-02-01

Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010832742014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] MONDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 14202/2014 Between: 1. SMT. VANAJONGI LAKSHMI,, W/O, V.APPA RAO, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, OCC: HOUSE WIFE, R/O, D.NO 27-208-1/6, LAXMINARASAMMA NAGAR, APPANAPALEM AREA, VEPAGUNTA (V), VISAKHAPATNAM. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER, Office of the Executive Officer, Sri Varaha Lakshmi Narasimha Swamy Devasthanam, Simhachalam-530028, Visakhapatnam District. ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate Writ, direction, or Order, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to the impugned Rc.No. 34/1070/2014 dated 23-032014 and set aside the same by holding it as illegal, contrary to Law and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 17687 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direction Respondents and their officials not to interfere with peaceful possession enjoyment of property admeasuring 187 Sq Yards in S.No.105 to 108 43/2, Vepagunta Village, pendurthi mandal, Visakhapatnam district by 2 suspending the operation of the impugned Rc.No. J4/1070/2014 dated 23-03- 2014 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M V S SAI KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent: 1. NVS PRASADA VARMA 2. JAGADISH KUAMAR BATCHU The Court made the following: 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 14202/2014 ORDER: When the matter is taken up for hearing, it is observed from the proceeding sheet that there was no representation for the petitioner on 12.11.2024, 22.01.2026 & 29.01.2026. The matter is posted to today under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Even today there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. The impugned notice is issued by identifying that the petitioner is an encroacher under Section 83 of the Endowments Act 30 of 1987. This indicates that the petitioner is not evincing any interest in prosecuting the matter. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 02.02.2026 TTPPSS 4 21 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 14202/2014 02.02.2026 TTPPSS