[2026:RJ-JP:9111] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1599/2026 1. Ram Gopal Sharma S/o Udai Narayan Sharma, Aged About 46 Years, R/o Sinwar, Ward No. 12, Jaipur, Ra- jasthan. 2. Mithlesh Kumar Sharma S/o Nahanu Ram Sharma, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Bhojwada, Dhanawar, District Dausa, Rajasthan. 3. Sukhram S/o Rohatash Singh, Aged About 51 Years, R/o Village Chawandi, Post Bhonker, Tehsil Kotkasim, District Khairthal-Tijara. 4. Satish Kumar Verma S/o Chhajuram Verma, Aged About 44 Years, R/o Syalawas Khurd (Rural), Dausa, Rajasthan. 5. Ummed Singh Gurjar S/o Ram Karan Gurjar, Aged About 41 Years, R/o Shekhpura, Abhaneri, District Dausa, Ra- jasthan. 6. Suman Kumawat W/o Ladu Ram Kumawat, Aged About 58 Years, R/o Plot No. 6, Govind Nagar-A, Kalwar Road, Hathod, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 7. Ramji Lal Sharma S/o Shri Birjuram Sharma, Aged About 45 Years, R/o House No. 56, Meeno Ka Mohalla Loyal, Ward No. 3, Loyal, Jhunjhunu. 8. Pinky Sharma D/o Laxmi Narayan Sharma, Aged About 42 Years, R/o 3, Kalishpuri, Behind Golimar Garden, Amer Road, Jaipur. 9. Vijay Singh Gurjar S/o Meva Ram Gurjar, Aged About 43 Years, R/o Bada Bass, Bhandeda, Bandikui, District Dausa. 10. Sitaram Yadav S/o Shri Ramswaroop Yadav, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Gudha Bairsal, Rampura Badiya, Gurha Barsal, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 11. Surendra Kumar Sharma S/o Prasadi Lal Sharma, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Tikki Walo Ka Mohalla, Baswa, Dis- trict Dausa, Rajasthan. 12. Kalu Ram Kumhar S/o Nanagram Kumhar, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Karnawar, Dausa, Rajasthan. 13. Sushmita W/o Anil Parewa, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Khateek Mohalla, Gandoora, Alwar, Rajasthan. [2026:RJ-JP:9111] (2 of 4) [CW-1599/2026] 14. Preetam Chand Saini S/o Dulli Chand Saini, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Behind Arya Kanya School, Alwar, Ra- jasthan. 15. Balveer Singh S/o Kishor Singh, Aged About 46 Years, R/o Post Gandura, Alwar, Rajasthan. 16. Sanjay Kumar Sharma S/o Babu Lal Sharma, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Joneta, Nathalwara, Rajgarh, District Alwar. 17. Vipin Choudhary S/o Rajpal Singh Choudhary, Aged About 41 Years, R/o 93, Jda Panhwati Colony, New Sanganer Road, Gurjar Ki Thadi, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 18. Smt. Vijay Sharma @ Vijay Jaiman D/o Vishnsahai Jaiman, Aged About 56 Years, R/o Gudha, Post Gudha Churani, Tehsil Thanagazi, District Alwar. 19. Haru Ram Dhanade S/o Tara Ram Dhanade, Aged About 47 Years, R/o Nagarda, Barmer, Rajasthan. 20. Girraj Prasad Saini S/o Sonya Ram Saini, Aged About 49 Years, R/o Village Pamadi, Post Unbadagaon, Tehsil Bandikui, District Dausa, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Additional Chief Secre- tary, Rural Development And Panchayati Raj Department, Secretariat, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 2. The Secretary Cum Commissioner, Rural Development And Panchayati Raj Department, Secretariat, Jaipur. 3. The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad Dausa, District Dausa. 4. The Block Development Officer, Panchayati Samiti Bandikui, Zila Parishad Dausa, District Dausa. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tarun Choudhary For Respondent(s) : Mr. Prateek Saxena for Mr. Kapil Prakash Mathur, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order [2026:RJ-JP:9111] (3 of 4) [CW-1599/2026] 27/02/2026 1. Instant writ petition is preferred by petitioners with following prayer: The respondents may kindly be directed to grant notional benefit to the petitioners like similarly situation incumbent namely Mahendra Kumar Meena from date of his appointment till her ac- tual joining on the same post pursuant to order dated 22.11.2018 issued by the respondent No.3 with all consequential service benefits. 2. Mr. Prateek Saxena on behalf of Mr. Kapil Prakash Mathur, AAG accepts notice on behalf of respondents 3. Office is directed to reflect name of Mr. Kapil Prakash Mathur, AAG as counsel for respondents. 4. Learned counsel for petitioners while referring and relying upon judgment dated 08.08.2025 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.11564/2025 titled as Prem Chand and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. submits that the controversy and the issue raised herein is already settled by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Hon’ble Court on the basis of ratio laid down in case of Pawan Meena Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. (SB CWP No.1665/2024 order dated 02.02.2024). He further submitted that instant writ petition be disposed of in accordance with aforesaid order. 5. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for parties and also material placed on record, the writ petition may be disposed in light of Prem Chand and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. (supra) Pawan Meena Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. (supra). [2026:RJ-JP:9111] (4 of 4) [CW-1599/2026] 6. In view of aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of in terms of ratio laid down in case of Prem Chand and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. (supra) Pawan Meena Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. (supra), if applicable upon facts of the case. The respondents are at liberty to verify veracity of the facts before extending the same benefits to the petitioners. 7. Needless to say that if ratio is applicable upon facts of the case as claimed by the petitioners, then same benefits be extended to the petitioners. 8. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J PREETI VALECHA /369