Page 1 of 3. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WP(C) No.1379 of 2026 Bijaya Kumar Dehury ..... Petitioner Represented by Adv. – Mr. Gopal Prasad Jena -versus- State of Odisha and others ..... Opposite Parties Represented by Adv. – Mr. Debendra Kumar Sahu, AGA CORAM: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR MOHAPATRA ORDER 02.02.2026 Order No. 01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid mode. 2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner as well as learned counsel for the State-Opposite Parties. Perused the writ petition as well as the documents annexed thereto. 3. The present writ petition has been filed by the Petitioner with the following prayers:- “In the aforesaid facts and the circumstances, it is humbly prayed that the Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to admit the writ application and call upon the Opposite Parties to show cause as to why the writ application should not be allowed and appropriate writ /writs should not be issued to the Opposite Parties directing the Opposite Parties to regularize the service of petitioner from 01.06.94 and grant notional increments and release regular salary Page 2 of 3. in favour of petitioner from 01.12.2003 as per direction of the Hon'ble Supreme Court. And after hearing the Opposite Parties, the Hon'ble Court be further pleased to issue writ of Mandamus or any other suitable writ/writs directing the Opposite Parties to regularize the service of petitioner from 01.06.94 and grant notional increments from 01.06.94 and pay regular salary from 01.12.2003 as per direction of the Hon'ble Supreme Court. And be further pleased to pass such other order(s)/direction(s) as the Hon'ble Court thinks fit and proper in the interest of justice;” 4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the Petitioner that although the Petitioner has filed representation dated 20.06.2025 before the Opposite Party No.3 under Annexure-7, but the same is still pending before the said Opposite Party and the said Opposite Party has not taken any decision as of now. 5. Learned counsel for the State submits that he has no objection, if a direction is given to the authority concerned to consider the representation of the Petitioner in accordance with law within a stipulated period of time. 6. Considering the submissions made by the respective parties and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court disposes of the writ petition at the stage of admission with a direction to the Opposite Party No.3 to consider the representation of the Petitioner dated 20.06.2025 under Annexure-7 by taking into consideration Annexures-1 and 4 in accordance with law within a period of eight weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order. It is needless to mention here that the Page 3 of 3. representation of the Petitioner shall be considered and disposed of by passing a speaking and reasoned order. Any decision so taken on the said representation shall be communicated to the Petitioner within ten days thereafter. Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application. (Aditya Kumar Mohapatra ) Judge Suchitra