IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12667 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-245 Year-2025 Thana- PARANDABAR District- Nawada ====================================================== 1. Upendra Prasad Son of Amrit Prasad R/o Village - Nandudih, P.S. - Parna Dabar, Dist. - Nawada. 2. Pankaj Kumar Son of Upendra Prasad R/o Village - Nandudih, P.S. - Parna Dabar, Dist. - Nawada. 3. Chhote Kumar Son of Upendra Yadav @ Upendra Prasad R/o Village - Dhuwripar (Bara), P.S. - Silao, Dist. - Nalanda 4. Munki Devi Wife of Upendra Prasad R/o Village - Nandudih, P.S. - Parna Danbar, Dist. - Nawada. 5. Babita Kumari @ Punam Devi Wife of Chhote Kumar D/o Upendra Prasad, R/o Village - Nandudih, P.S. - Parna Danbar, Dist. - Nawada. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 2 24-03-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad, learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 117(2), 74, 303(2), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the BNS. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that accused persons on 16.09.2025, at 07:00 p.m., came and Upendra assualted Soni by axe causing injury on her head Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12667 of 2026(2) dt.24-03-2026 2/4 and Pankaj assaulted the informant indiscriminately by khanti causing fractur of his left hand thereafter Ram Bilash and Sudhir assualted the informant and his son and even assaulted his wife and sister-in-law while Chhote snatched the chain of his daughter and earrings of his sister-in-law and Munki along with Babita threw bricks causing injury to the sister-in-law of the informant and snatched her chain. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is further submitted that from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that Pankaj is alleged to have assaulted the informant indiscriminately by khanti causing fractrue of his left hand but then from perusal of the injury report, it would manifest that the informant suffered fracture of leg which has been opined to be grievous. It is fairly submitted that Upendra is alleged to have assaulted Soni by axe cauisng injury on head and the injury has been opined to be grievous but then no reason for the occurrence has been alleged. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners and submits that there is specific allegation against Upendra of assaulting Soni by axe causing injury on head and the same has been opined to be Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12667 of 2026(2) dt.24-03-2026 3/4 grievous in nature. It is further submitted that no doubt, Pankaj is alleged to have assaulted indiscriminately the informant by khanti causing fracture of his left hand but then in the injury report it is recorded that informant suffered fracture of left leg which has been opined to be grievous. It is next submitted that it might be a possibility that inadvertently the said amiss took place in the FIR. 6. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, let the petitioners no. 3, 4 and 5, above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Teb Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Parna Dabar P.S. Case No. 245 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C./482(2) of the B.N.S.S. 7. The Court is not inclined to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioners no. 1 and 2, above-named, in connection with Parna Dabar P.S. Case No. 245 of 2025 pending in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Nawada/Successor Court. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12667 of 2026(2) dt.24-03-2026 4/4 8. Hence, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners no. 1 and 2 is rejected. Kundan/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T