PRAKASH SARKAR AND ANR v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.
WPA/14689/2026 · 2026-07-15
Om Narayan Rai
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 28593 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 28593 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
N.22Sl 151/CL 15.07.26 DL-10 Ct-07 (S.R.)
WPA 14689 of 2026 Sri Prakash Sarkar & Anr. v. State of West Bengal & Ors. Ms. Subhra Nag … for the petitioners. Mr. Asim Hati Mr. Antariksha Karmakar … for the State. Mr. Sumit Kumar Panja Mr. Sumit Ray … for the WBSEDCL. Mr. Amit Kumar Nag Ms. Rishita Sarkar … for the respondent nos.6 and 7.
1. Affidavit of service filed in Court today is taken on record.
2. As prayed for by Ms. Nag, learned advocate appearing for the petitioners leave is granted to add the Project Manager, Paschim Bardhaman, Field Zonal Office, Spondon Complex, West Bengal as a party respondent in the writ petition.
3. The petitioner is aggrieved by non-consideration of the
petitioners’
representation
seeking compensation for drawing high tension transmission line over the petitioners’ land by the West Bengal State Electricity Transmission Company Ltd.
4. The respondents are represented.
5. Since the representation made by the petitioners on April 7, 2026 to the authorities of the West
Bengal State Electricity Transmission Company Ltd. is still pending, it would be in the fitness of thing to direct the added respondent i.e. the Project Manager, Paschim Bardhaman, Field Zonal Office, Spondon Complex, West Bengal to consider the petitioners’ representation (made through her advocate) dated April 7, 2026 (Annexure P-4 at pages 21 to 25 of the writ petition) within a period of four weeks from date upon affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners. The Project Manger shall dispose of the petitioners’ representation by a reasoned order, in accordance with law within the period aforesaid and communicate such order to the petitioners within a period of one week from the date of passing thereof.
6. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merit of the petitioners’ case and all points are left open to be urged by the petitioners before the Project Manager and to be considered by the Project Manager, in accordance with law.
7. Since no affidavits have been invited, the allegations made against the respondents shall be deemed not to have been admitted.
8. With the aforesaid observations, WPA 14689 of 2026 stands disposed of.
9. There shall be no order as to costs.
10. Urgent certified photocopy of this order, if 2
applied for, be supplied as expeditiously as possible. (Om Narayan Rai, J.) 3