1 APHC010957962017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] WEDNESDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2771/2017 Between: 1. NEYYILA JOGARAMAYYA,, S/O.JAGANNADHAM, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, OCC: SENIOR MATE, R/O.RANIGAM VILLAGE, TALLABHADRA GRAM PANCHAYATH, SOMPETA MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT, A.P. ...PETITIONER AND 1. H KURMA RAO, PROJECT DIRECTOR, THE DISTRICT WATER USERS' AGENCY, MAHATMA GANDHI NATIONAL RURAL EMPLOYMENT GUARANTEE SCHEME (MGNREGS), SRIKAKULAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT, A.P. ...CONTEMNOR Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the Respondent herein, after issuance of the notice for willfully and deliberately disobeyed the orders of this Hon'ble Court, passed in WPMP.No.15674 of 2017 in W.P.No.12629 of 2017, dt.24.04.2017, under the Contempt of Courts Act, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K RAMA KOTESWARA RAO Counsel for the Contemnor: 1. The Court made the following: 2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2771/2017 ORDER:- The contempt case has been filed for non-compliance with the Order dated 24.04.2017 passed in W.P.M.P.No.15674 of 2017 in W.P. No.12629 of 2017. 2. Heard Mr.K.Ramakoteswara Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.M.S.R.Chandra Murthy, learned Standing Counsel for respondent. 3. Mr. M.S.R. Chandra Murthy, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent, submits that, consequent to the interim direction of this Court, an appropriate speaking order was passed on 04.08.2018 by the respondent and, therefore, the contempt case may close. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the main writ petition was dismissed on 21.11.2024. In view of the dismissal of the main writ petition, the petitioner is not inclined to pursue the present contempt proceedings against the respondent. 5. Accordingly, recording the above submissions, the contempt case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. ____________________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 18.02.2026 S D P 3 110 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2771/2017 18.02.2026 W S D P