IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 108 Dr. Deepanshu State of Haryana and others CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present: - NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) 1. Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of Certiorari for quashing the vide which the petitioner has been transferred to Bihar in that he cannot b 2. submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the instant writ petition liberty to the petitioner to take recourse of the appropriate remed accordance with law. 3. 4. 5. 10.07.2026 rishu IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP Date of Decision: Dr. Deepanshu Versus State of Haryana and others CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. KS Banyana, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Tanushree Gupta, Addl. A.G., Haryana. NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of for quashing the transfer order dated vide which the petitioner has been transferred to Bihar in that he cannot be transferred outside the State of Haryana. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the instant writ petition liberty to the petitioner to take recourse of the appropriate remed accordance with law. Permitted to do so. Dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-20588-2026 Date of Decision: 10.07.2026 .… Petitioner .... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. KS Banyana, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Tanushree Gupta, Addl. A.G., Haryana. writ petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of transfer order dated 02.06.2026 (Annexure P-2) vide which the petitioner has been transferred to Bihar in-spite of the fact e transferred outside the State of Haryana. , learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the instant writ petition, with liberty to the petitioner to take recourse of the appropriate remedy, if any, in Dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of 2) spite of the fact petitioner , with y, if any, in RISHU KATARIA 2026.07.10 19:39 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.