15.07.2026 Court No.35. D/L.30. Rakib (Rejected) CRM (NDPS) 1034 of 2026 In Re: An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/Under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Lalgola Police Station case no. 930 of 2025 dated 29.10.2025 under Sections 21(c)/29 of the NDPS Act. And In the matter of : Md. Kalimuddin Sk. ……Petitioner. Mr. Sayan Mukherjee Ms. Mayurakshi Saha Mr. Anisur Rahaman .....for the Petitioner. Mr. Soumya Raha ……for the State. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been implicated along with another for recovery from joint possession of 1355 grams of heroin. Petitioner is in custody for 8 months 18 days and although, charge-sheet has been submitted but witness action has not commenced. Prosecution has relied upon 10 witnesses in the charge-sheet, as such petitioner may be released on bail. Learned advocate appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail. I have taken into account the quantum of seizure in the present case, and I am of the opinion that rigors of Section 37 of the NDPS Act is attracted. As such, the prayer for bail of the petitioner in CRM (NDPS) 1034 of 2026 is rejected. 2 However, learned trial Court is directed to expedite the process of trial and give priority to the evidence of the seizure list witnesses preferably within a period of three months from the date of consideration of charges. Memo of evidence submitted by the State be kept with the record. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)