APHC010864972017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] FRIDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 2914/2017 Between: 1. CHEKURTHI RAVI BABU, GUNTUR DT.,, S/O. PRASADA RAO, OCC : PANCHANAYAT BOARD PRESIDENT/ SOCIAL WORKER, R/O. H.NO. 1-84, NEAR LEPP SCHOOL, VENKATAPALEM VILLAGE, TULLURU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP REP PP 2 OTRS, REP BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD, FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA & A.P., HYDERABAD. 2. VADLAPATI NAGASUDHA RANI CHEKURTHY NAGASUDHA RANI, W/O. CHEKURTHI RAVI BABU, D/O. V. VARA PRASAD, OCC : HOUSE WIFE(WORKING WOMAN), R/O. D.NO. 8-32/1-7, WYNCHIPET, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. CHEKURTHI PRANATHI, D/O. CHEKURTHI RAVI BABU, C/O. V. VARA PRASAD, BEING MINOR REP. BY HER MOTHER AS NATURAL GUARDIAN, NOW RESIDING UNDER THE SHELTER OF HER RELATIVES, R/O. D.NO. 8-32/1-7, WYNCHIPET, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the CriminalRevisionCase, the High Court may be pleased toto present this memorandum of grounds of Crl.Rc. being aggrieved by the order and decree passed in Mc.No. 276 of 2014 dated 19-7-2017 on the file of the Family Court cum IV Additional District and Sessions Judge at Vijayawada, Krishna District for the following among other; 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2017(CRLRCMP 4746 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. G VIJAYA SARADHI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) 2. S S PRAKASH The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.2914 of 2017 ORDER: Sri G. Vijaya Saradhi, learned counsel for the revision petitioner/husband, would submit that at this length of time, the revision petitioner/husband is willing to pay the maintenance amount as ordered by the learned trial Court and, hence, no further orders are necessary in the criminal revision case. 2. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor representing the 1st respondent-State is in attendance. 3. Sri S.S. Prakash, learned counsel for respondent Nos.2 and 3, is in attendance. 4. In the light of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the revision petitioner/husband that no further orders are necessary in the criminal revision case, the Criminal Revision Case is closed without going into the merits of the case. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Criminal Revision Case shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 30th January, 2026 cbn 4 117 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No: 2914 OF 2017 30th January, 2026 cbn