APHC010945312018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] TUESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION No.45724/2018 Between: 1. TALASU ESWARA RAO, S/O TALASU VENKATESHAM, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O H.NO. 11- 1-221/A, MAHARANIPETA KASIBUGGA, PALASA, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, TEKKALI, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, PALASA MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, to declare the action of the respondent No.4 in threatening to dispossess the petitioner from his lawful possession in respect of the land in Sy.No. 67/3 admeasuring Ac. 1.35 cents situated at Boddupadu Village, Palasa Mandal, Srikakulam District, without 2 issuing any notice and without following the procedure contemplated under the Statute, as being illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and violative of Articles 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 4th respondent not to take any coercive steps without following the due process of Law. IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass orders directing the respondent No.4 herein not to dispossess or in any manner interfere with the possession and enjoyment of the petitioner in respect of the in Sy.No. 67/3 admeasuring Ac. 1.35 cents situated at Boddupadu Village, Palasa Mandal, Srikakulam District, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition. IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders dated: 17-12-2018 passed in I.A.No.01/2018 in W.P.No.45724/2018 and dismiss the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. S PRASAD BABU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) The Court made the following 3 ORDER: The matter was posted on 30.12.2025 and 18.02.2026, but there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. The matter was again listed on 25.02.2026; on that day too, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner and consequently, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption of ‘For Dismissal’. 2. When the matter was called today under the caption of ‘For Dismissal’, there was no representation on behalf of learned counsel for the petitioner. 3. It appears that the learned counsel for the petitioner is not interested to prosecute the matter. 4. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. 5. Interim order, granted earlier on 17.12.2018, stands vacated. Consequently, Miscellaneous Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date:10.03.2026 DSH