Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2857 (JHR)

MASUK MANISH ALIAS MONU SINGH ALIAS MASHUK MANISH v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./328/2026 · 2026-03-30

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

(2026:JHHC:8783) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 328 of 2026 Masuk Manish @ Monu Singh @ Mashuk Manish, aged about 35 years, s/o Ajay Kumar Singh, r/o Post Office Road, New Adarsh Colony Mango, PO & PS – Mango, Town – Jamshedpur, District – East Singhbhum, Jharkhand. … … …Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand. … … …Opp. Party ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. A. K. Kashyap, Sr. Advocate For the State : Mr. Shailesh Kr. Sinha, Addl. P.P. ------ HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ Order No:- 04, Dated:- 30th March, 2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has moved before this Court for grant of bail in connection with S. T. Case No. 440 of 2025 arising out of Mango P.S. Case No. 203 of 2023, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 307, 34 of the Indian Penal Code along with Section 27 of the Arms Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner in furtherance of common intention with co-accused attempted to murder Akash Namta. It is next submitted that no one has sustained injury in the alleged occurrence and charge-sheet has already been submitted. It is next submitted that the co-accused person of this case has already been granted bail by a co-ordinate bench of this Court dated 04.10.2023 in B.A. No. 7886 of 2023 [Ankesh Kumar Vs. The State of Jharkhand]. The petitioner has been in custody since 23.06.2025 as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 19 of the bail application but charge has not yet been framed. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and also undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. Learned Addl. P. P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, and also as the co-accused person of this case has already been granted bail by a co-ordinate bench of this Court, this Court is inclined to enlarge the above-named petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty-Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge – VI, East Singhbhum, Jamshedpur, in connection with S.T. Case No. 440 of 2025, arising out of Mango P.S. Case No. 203 of 2023, with the condition that the petitioner will cooperate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and a copy of his Aadhar Card in the court below with the undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Aditi