- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:19175 WP No. 8881 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 07TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 8881 OF 2026 (EDN-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. SANJAY G.B. S/O BASAVARAJAPPA B.M. AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS, R/AT 1215/84 2ND MAIN, 6TH CROSS, BEHIND VISHAL MART DAVANAGERE-577005. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAKESH T.S., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. TRIVIKRAM S.S., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE REGISTRAR (EVALUATION) RAJIV GANDHI UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES HAVING ITS OFFICE AT 4TH ' T BLOCK JAYANAGAR BENGALURU-560041. 2. RAJIV GANDHI UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES HAVING ITS OFFICE AT 4TH T BLOCK JAYANAGAR BENGALURU-560041. Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:19175 WP No. 8881 of 2026 3. THE NATIONAL MEDICAL COMMISSION REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, POCKET 14, SECTOR 8 NEW DELHI-110077. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. FARAH FATHIMA, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2; SRI. H.R. SHOWRI, ADVOCATE FOR R3) *************** THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS NO.1 AND 2 TO REFER THE PETITIONER'S PAPERS FOR 3RD EVALUATION FOR THE SUBJECT ANATOMY PAPER TP-1 AND TP2 WITH QP CODE 5501 AND 5502 VIDE ANNEXURE-D AND D1 AND TO DECLARE THE RESULTS AFRESH IN THE ENDS OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP , THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:19175 WP No. 8881 of 2026 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER 1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. 2. In this Writ Petition, petitioner sought for a writ of mandamus to direct the respondent-University to refer the petitioner's papers for third evaluation for the subject-Anatomy Paper TP-1 and TP-2 with QP Code 5501 and 5502 (Annexures- D and D1 respectively) and to declare the result afresh. 3. Having taken note of a submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the parties and also the Notification dated 05.09.2022, placed by the learned counsel appearing for the respondent-University would make it clear that there is no Rule/Regulation providing for the third evaluation of the papers as sought for by the petitioner. It is also to be noted from the observation made by the Division Bench of this Court in Writ Appeal No.1372/2025 and connected Writ Appeals disposed of on 19.02.2026, wherein this Court has held that the revaluation of the answer scripts by a third Evaluator cannot be accepted. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:19175 WP No. 8881 of 2026 4. In that view of the matter, following the declaration of law made by the Division Bench as noted above and as well as there is no Rule of the respondent-University providing for the third evaluation or revaluation as sought for by the petitioner, I am of the view that the Writ Petition is not maintainable and accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE sac List No.: 2 Sl No.: 63