APHC010994682018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] MONDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 1692/2019 Between: 1. T. ANNAYYA, T. ANNAYYA, S/O LATE GOVINDA SWAMY NAIDU, AGED 48 YEARS, R/O BOYA CHINNAGANAPALLI VILLAGE, CHINTHAMAKULA PALLI POST, V. KOTA MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE UNION OF INDIA, THE UNION OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT AND HIGHWAYS, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, NEW DELHI. 2. THE NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA, REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN, NEW DELHI. 3. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATHI. 4. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, /COMPETENT AUTHORITY FOR LAND ACQUISITION TO N.H.NO.234 NEW NO.75, CHITTOOR. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in issuing notification No.360 dt.29-01- 2 2018 for acquisition of the lands of the petitioner in Sy.No.182/1A and 182/2B of Boyachinnaganapalli village, V. Kota Mandal, Chittoor District without considering the objection of the petitioner and without considering the request for alternative land, as highly illegal, arbitrary and set aside the same and consequently direct the respondents to change the alignment of the road or to consider the request of the petitioner for alternative lands in the interest of justice. IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to dispossess the petitioner from his lands in Sy.No.182/1A and 182/2B of Boyachinnaganapalli village, V. Kota Mandal, Chittoor district pending disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. AFSAR JAHAN Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following 3 ORDER: When the matter was listed consecutively on 15.02.2019, 19.01.2023 and 27.01.2023, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner and, consequently, the matter was directed to be listed on 06.02.2023 under the caption of ‘For Dismissal’. On 03.03.2026, when the matter was listed, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner and the matter was directed to be listed next. 2. Even today, when the matter is listed under the caption of ‘For Dismissal’, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. 3. It appears that the learned counsel for the petitioner is not interested to prosecute the matter. 4. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date:30.03.2026 DSH