Nandayal Kambagiri v. The state of Andhra prasdesh
WP/44289/2018 · 2026-03-01
Sumathi Jagadam
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 28553 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 28553 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010917372018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] MONDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 44289/2018 Between:
1. NANDAYAL KAMBAGIRI, S/O KAMBANNA, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, OCCUPATION. COOLI, R/O.MAHANADI PURAM VILLAGE, KOLIMNAGANDLA MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT, NOW TEMPRARLY RESIDING AT G. UPPALAPADU VILLAGE, MILAVARAM MANDAL, CUDDAPA DISTIRCT. ...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRASDESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINICIPAL SECRETARTY TO THE REVENUE DEVELOPMEMNT AT AMARAVTHI
2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KURNOOL. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISNAL OFFICER, 14ANDYAL AT NANYDAL. 4. THE TAHASILDAR, KOLIMIGANDAL MANDAL , KURNOOL DISTRCIT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may
2 JS,J W.P.No.44289 of 2018
be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction and more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 4th respondent in not taking any action, with regard to our land in Sy No. 735 to an extent of Ac 2-90Cents, basing on the application of the petitioner dated 23-08-2018, as arbitrary, illegal , violative of the Article 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and without following the procedure contemplated under Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass books Act, 1971 and rules made there under and consequently direct the respondent No.4 to consider the application of the petitioner dated 23-08-2018 and to take action, with regard the land in Sy No. 735 an extent of Ac2-90Cents and to pass such other order or orders as this Honble Court may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No.4 to consider the application of the petitioner dated 23-08-2018 and to take action, with regard the land of the petitioner in Sy No. 735 to an extent of Ac2-90Cents and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. GOVIND REDDY KONTHAM Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) This Court made the following:
3 JS,J W.P.No.44289 of 2018
ORDER:
There is no representation for the petitioner.
Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing on behalf of the respondents, upon the written instructions of the 4th respondent vide Rc.A. 65/2026 dated 28.02.2026, submits that the petitioner’s name was mutated in the revenue records to an extent of Acs.2.18 cents in Sy.No.735 of Chintalayapalle Village, Kolimigundla Mandal, Nandyala District. In view of the same, this Court is of the opinion that no further orders are required in the writ petition. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is closed. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM 2nd March, 2026 cbs
4 JS,J W.P.No.44289 of 2018
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION No.44289 of 2018
2nd March, 2026 cbs