APHC010290922026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3566] THURSDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SURESH REDDY THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA WRIT PETITION NO: 15324/2026 Between: 1. M. BHARATHI, W/O. M. CHALAPATHI NAIDU, AGED 60 YEARS, OCC HOUSEHOLD, R/O. MADHAV NAGAR, BANGARUPALYAM, JAMBUVARIPALLE, CHITTOOR DISTRICT - 517416. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, AMARAVATHI AT VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT - 522237. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, MANGALAGIRI,- GUNTUR DISTRICT - 522501. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT - 522004. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PATTABHIPURAM POLICE STATION, GUNTUR DISTRICT - 522006. 2 5. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, VIJAYAWADA CITY, NTR DISTRICT - 520001. 6. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, MACHAVARAM POLICE STATION, NTR DISTRICT-520008. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue a writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Habeas Corpus directing the respondent No. 6 viz.. Station House Officer, Machavaram Police Station, Vijayawada City to produce the detenu viz., M.V. Murali Krishna before this Honble court and he may be released after declaring his detention at Machavaram Police Station, Vijayawada City as illegal and unconstitutional and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. D PURNACHANDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. THE ADVOCATE GENERAL The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURESH REDDY THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA WRIT PETITION NO. 15324 OF 2026 ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice K.Suresh Reddy) Today, when the matter is taken up, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication, as the detenue has already been released and is at liberty. 2. In view of the above submissions, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall also stand closed. ____________________ K.SURESH REDDY, J __________________________ A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA, J Date: 11.06.2026 Pab 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURESH REDDY THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA WRIT PETITION NO. 15324 OF 2026 Date:- 11.06.2026 Pab 5 6