CRP No. 2127 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 04-06-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE CRP No. 2127 of 2026 AND CMP NO. 9326 OF 2026 1. Bhagya K Mohan Petitioner(s) Vs V.R. Krishnaiah Setty (Died) 1. K.R. Manjula 2.V.K. Venkatachalapathy 3.Lakshmikanthamma 4.Yasodha 5.V.K. Prema 6.Sujatha 7.Baby Rani 8.Seluvamma 9.Jayaprakash 10.Raghavendra 11.Soundaravalli 12.The Tahsildar Taluk Office, Denkanikotta. Respondent(s) PRAYER Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to set https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP No. 2127 of 2026 aside the fair and decretal order passed in IA No.7/2025 in OS No.83/2008 dated 30.10.2025 on the file of the Additional District Munsif, Denkanikottai. For Petitioner(s): Mr.S.C.Vishwanth For Respondent(s): Mr. S. Gunasekaran for R12 ORDER The civil revision petition has been filed, challenging the impugned order dated 30.10.2025 passed by the Additional District Munsif, Denkanikottai in I.A. No. 7 of 2025 in O.S. No. 83 of 2008. 2. The aforesaid application was filed by the petitioner under Order I Rule 10 of CPC, seeking to implead herself as a party to the suit in O.S. No. 83 of 2008 pending on the file of the Additional District Munsif, Denkanikottai. The trial court has dismissed the said application on the ground that the petitioner had approached the court belatedly with an inordinate delay to implead herself as a party to the proceedings. 3. The suit is of the year 2008, whereas the interlocutory application filed by the petitioner was only in the year 2025. The suit was filed for declaration of title by the plaintiff. The petitioner also claims ownership of the same. 4. As a party, who claims ownership, she ought to have been vigilant in prosecuting the matter. Rightly, the trial court has dismissed the application filed by the petitioner, by observing that the petitioner has approached the trial court https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP No. 2127 of 2026 to implead herself as a party to the suit after a lapse of more than sixteen years from the date of filing of the suit. 5. This court does not find any infirmity in the findings of the trial court. 6. For the foregoing reasons, this court does not find any merit in this civil revision petition and accordingly, the civil revision petition is dismissed. No Costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 04-06-2026 Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Internet:Yes Neutral Citation:Yes/No ab To 1. The Additional District Munsif, Denkanikottai. 2. The Section Officer, V.R. Section, Madras High Court. 3.The Tahsildar Taluk Office, Denkanikotta. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP No. 2127 of 2026 ABDUL QUDDHOSE J. ab CRP No. 2127 of 2026 AND CMP NO. 9326 OF 2026 04-06-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis