Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 28548 (PNJ)

RAJVIR KAUR v. STATE OF PUNJAB

CRM-M/30269/2026 · 2026-07-10

Surya Partap Singh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

105 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh Criminal Misc. No. M-30269 of 2026 Date of Decision: 10.07.2026 Rajvir Kaur ... Petitioner(s) Versus State of Punjab ... Respondent(s) CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Surya Partap Singh. Present: Mr. Jasdeep Singh Salooja, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Mr. Eklavya Darshi, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, for the respondent. Mr. Sourabh Singla, Advocate for the complainant. Surya Partap Singh, J. 1. This petition for anticipatory bail is the first petition filed by the petitioner under Section 482 of ‘the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023’. It has been filed with regard to a case arising out of FIR No.102 dated 08.07.2025, for the commission of offence punishable under Section(s) 329(3), 303(2), 324(4), 351(2) & 61(2) of ‘the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023’, Police Station Pasyana, District Patiala, Punjab. 2. Vide order dated 26.05.2026, the petitioner was admitted to interim anticipatory bail, subject to the condition of furnishing bonds to the satisfaction of arresting officer. It was also directed that the petitioner shall join the investigation. 3. The learned State Counsel has filed short reply. The same be DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2026.07.10 20:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Criminal Misc. No. M-30269 of 2026 2 taken on record. 4. Heard. 5. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that in compliance with order dated 26.05.2026, the petitioner has already joined the investigation, and that nothing has been left to be recovered from the possession of petitioner. In view of above, the learned counsel for the petitioner has requested that the order dated 26.05.2026 be made absolute. 6. The learned State counsel, on the instructions of ‘ASI Prabjot Singh’, has submitted that the petitioner has joined investigation, and that for further investigation of this case her custodial interrogation is not required. 7. The record has been perused carefully. 8. Keeping in view the aforesaid submissions and the fact that the petitioner has already joined the investigation, it is hereby ordered that the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail. Hence, the present petition is hereby allowed and the order dated 26.05.2026, whereby the petitioner was accorded the benefit of interim anticipatory bail, is hereby made absolute. (Surya Partap Singh) Judge July 10, 2026 “DK” Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2026.07.10 20:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document