Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 28547 (AP)

M/s. Parkville Projects Pvt. Ltd. v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/37119/2018 · 2026-02-18

Sumathi Jagadam

Original Suitbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010765892018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] THURSDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 37119/2018 Between: 1. M/S. PARKVILLE PROJECTS PVT. LTD., GUNTUR, REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, C.N. SRINIVAS, S/O. LATE C. MADHUSUDHAN. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE COLLECTOR, GUNTUR DISTRICT, COLLECTOR OFFICE COMPOUND, GUNTUR, A.P. 3. THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR, SURVEY AND LAND RECORDS, COLLECTOR OFFICE, R AND B QUARTERS, NAGARAPALEM, GUNTUR. 4. THE MANDAL SRUVEYOR, TALUKA OFFICE, 6TH LANE BRODIEPET, GUNTUR-0522002. 5. MR M YUGANDHAR, R/O. D.NO.3-14-15, MAIN ROAD, PATTAHIPURAM, GUNTUR CITY. 6. MR GIRIDHAR, REP. BY G.P.A., TUMMALA KOTESWARA RAO, R/O. D.NO. 4-5-29/80, 4/3, VIDYA NAGAR, GUNTUR CITY, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ under Article 226 of Constitution declaring the imminent proposed action of Respondents 3 and 4 under the instructions of Respondent No. 2 to resurvey the land in D.No. 223 under the guise of surveying D.No. 217, Nallapadu Village which is the subject matter of O.S.No. 503/2014 before IV Additional Senior Civil Judge, Guntur as illegal, arbitrary, unjust, unconstitutional and violative of principles of natural justice and consequentially direct Respondents 2 to 4 not to resurvey the Land in D.No. 217 and 223 Nallapadu Village, Guntur and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings pursuant to undated impugned notice issued by Respondent No.4 under the instructions of Respondents 2 & 3 to resurvey the land in D.No. 223 under the guise of surveying D.No. 217, Nallapadu Village, Guntur, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. Y PADMAVATHI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 2. GHANTA SRIDHAR 3 The Court made the following ORDER: Though the matter was adjourned on 11.02.2026, there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption “for dismissal”. Today when the matter is called, there is no representation for the petitioner. It appears that the learned counsel for the petitioner is not interested to argue the case. Therefore, the Writ Petition is dismissed as non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 19.02.2026 KAS 4 227 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 37119/2018 Dated: 19.02.2026 KAS