Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
CGHC010049832022
2026:CGHC:30921
NAFR HIGH COURT of CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 1122 of 2022 Manju Nishad W/o Kartik Ram Nishad Aged About 53 Years R/o Care off Rajaram Nishad, Near Gyan Jyoti School, Chote Atarmuda, Raigarh Thana Chakradhar Nagar Chhattisgarh.
... Petitioner versus 1 - The Registrar High Court of Chhattisgarh, High Court of Chhattisgarh Premise, Tahsil Belha, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. 2 - The Family Court, Raigarh, District Court Premise, Raigarh Tahsil Raigarh, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh.
... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. N. K. Malaviya, Advocate For Respondents : Mr. Prasun Kumar Bhaduri, Advocate Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 21/07/2026
1. At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner may be permitted to approach the competent forum in accordance with the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, as the petitioner was a daily-wage employee and her services were discontinued without following due process of law.
2. On the other hand, learned counsel appearing for the respondents would submit that a representation made by the petitioner seeking Digitally signed by NADIM MOHLE
2 reinstatement was rejected vide order dated 30.06.2015, and she has not challenged the said order.
3. Having considered the submissions made by Mr. Malaviya, this petition is disposed of reserving liberty in favour of the petitioner to approach the competent forum by raising her grievance.
4. If the dispute is raised before the competent authority, it is expected that the same may be considered and decided expeditiously. Sd/-
Rakesh Mohan Pandey
JUDGE Nadim