APHC010898772018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] TUESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 43396/2018 Between: 1. BHAJANTRI SANJEEVA RAYUDU, S/O LATE BHAJANTRI VENKATA RAMUDU QR. NO.2078/B, B.H.E.L. TOWN SHIP NEAR STADIUM, NH - 5, RAMACHANDRAPURAM, MEDAK, TELANGANA - 502 032 2. ILLURU RAGHAVENDRA, S/O APPAIAH R/O. H.NO.1-70, KALAPURAM, G.KOTTALA, PAMIDI VILLAGE, ANANTHAPUR, A.P. - 515775 3. BHAJANTHRI CHANDRA SEKHAR, C/O BHAJANTRI SANJEEVA RAYUDU QR. NO.2078/B, B.H.E.L. TOWN SHIP NEAR STADIUM, NH - 5, RAMACHANDRAPURAM, MEDAK, TELANGANA - 502 032 4. REDDY ALTHAF HUSEN, S/O REDDY MAHAMAD HUSAN, 2-40-C, BESTHA STREET, PAMIDI, ANANTHAPUR - 515775 5. BAJANTRI SATYANARAYANA, S/O BAJANTRI VENKATA RAMULU QR.NO. 337/1F, BHEL TOWNSHIP, NEAR VENKATESWARA TEMPLE, RAMACHANDRAPURAM RAMACHANDRAPURAM MANDAL, MEDAK - 502 032. 6. DEVARAPALLI BHUVAN, S/O. LATE BHAJANTHRI DEVARAPALLE NAGARAJU, S/O BHAJANTHRI DEVARAPALLE VENKATA RAMUDU R/O KONDAPURAM VILLAGE, PAMIDI MANDALAM GUTHI TALUQ, ANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. 7. ILLURU MANORAMA, W/O ILURU ESWARAIAH, RIO. H.NO. 4-66, L.N.TEMPLE STREET, PAMIDI, ANANTHAPUR, ANDHRA PRADESH - 515775 2 ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPLE SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, A.P - 522503 2. THE COMMISSIONER, AND INSPECTOR GENERAL OF REGISTRATION AND STAMPS OFFICE, AMARAVATHI, VIJAYADA, A.P- 521151 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR AND DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT ANANTHAPUR - 515001 4. THE SUBREGISTRAR, PAMIDI, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT-515775 5. THE TAHSILDAR, PAMIDI MANDAL, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT, 515775 6. THE MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER, PAMIDI MANDAL, ANANTHAPURAM DIST.-515775 ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. VANGA ANITA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 3 The Court made the following ORDER: Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondents. 2. In view of the submissions made by both the learned counsel, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition by directing the petitioners to approach the appropriate authority seeking deletion of the property from the prohibitory list. If the petitioners makes such an application, the respondents shall consider and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. 3. With the above observations and directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 31.03.2026 KNN 4 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 43396/2018 Dated: 31.03.2026 KNN 5