1 D/L 912 15.07.2026 Rohit, A.R.(Ct.) ct.no.35 Rejected IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE C.R.M (A) 512 of 2026 Jitendra Chaurasia Vs The State of West Bengal In Re: An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 arising out of Baishnabnagar Police Station Case No. 146 of 2025 dated 12.02.2025 under Sections 179/180/61(2)of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 And In the matter of : Jitendra Chaurasia ……Petitioner. Ms. Shivani Pandey …for the Petitioner Mr. Krishnendu Das, Ld. A.P.P Mr. B. Jha Mr. Mukesh Kr. Gupta …for the State 1. Learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a business man. He has dealt with one of the principle accused officially. There is an agreement. So far as the issue relating to FICN is concerned petitioner has no role to play. If a person with whom the petitioner has transacted has in any manner violated the provisions of law petitioner cannot be held responsible for the same. Police authorities is chasing the petitioner and intending to force the petitioner with a criminal case. 2 2. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State submits that there are materials which suggest that one of the principle accused was in touch with the present petitioner and primarily the prosecution case is that the petitioner happens to be the recipient of Fake Indian Currency. 3. Having considered the aforesaid I am not inclined to allow the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner. 4. Accordingly, CRM (A) 512 of 2026 is dismissed. 5. Interim order, if any, is hereby vacated. 6. All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the Official website of this Court. 7. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)