1 CGHC010013762023 2026:CGHC:31231 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 185 of 2023 1 - Rohan Kumar S/o Shri Shambhu Choudhary Aged About 24 Years R/o Village Shinghiya, Makandpur, Tahsil Gopalpur, District Bhagalpur Bihar ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary Department Of Higher Education, Block 3 Second And Third Floor, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - Registrar Kalinga University, Kotni, Near Mantralaya Naya Raipur C.G. 3 - Chairman Chhattisgarh Niji Vishwavidyalaya Viniyamak Ayog Madhu Pilley Chouk, In Front Of Ram Temple Shanti Nagar, Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Shri Sanjay Kumar Yadav, Advocate. For State/respondent : Dr. Arham Siddiqui, PL. For Respondent No.2 : Shri Ankit Singhal, Advocate. For Respondent No.3 : Shri Manish Nigam, Advocate. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 22/07/2026 1. This Writ Petition has been filed for the following reliefs:- 1. This Hon'ble Court be pleased to direct the Respondent Authority to set aside the letter dated 03.04.2019 by which the respondent no 2 cancelled the admission in the respective course/class in Kalinga University Raipur and banned his entry in the university campus letter dated 03.04.2019 by which the respondent no 2 cancelled the admission in the respective course/class in Kalinga University Raipur and banned his entry in the university campus and also set aside the notice dated 05.10.2018 by AVINASH SHARMA Digitally signed by AVINASH SHARMA Date: 2026.07.23 18:04:05 +0530 2 which the respondent authority has been suspended the petitioner from university. 2. This Hon'ble Court be pleased to direct the respondent authority to decide the representation of petitioner within 15 days. 3. Any other relief as deemed fit by this Hon'ble Court. 2. At the outset, learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that the present Writ Petition has become infructuous having regard to the reliefs sought by the petitioner. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would also not dispute the said submission and submits that this Writ Petition has become infructuous. 4. In view of the submission made by the parties, this Writ Petition has become infructuous. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Avinash