APHC010796532014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] MONDAY,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 38864/2014 Between: 1.A. SIDDAIAH,, S/O KULLAYAPPA, AGED ABOUT : 33 YEARS, OCC: FIELD ASSISTANT, RESIDING AT KAMARUPALLI VILLAGE, ANANTAPUR RURAL MANDAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHAYATRAJ & RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. 2.THE NATIONAL RURAL EMPLOYMENT GUARANTEE SCHEME, (NREGS) REP. BY ITS DISTRICT COLLECTOR & DISTRICT PROGRAMME COORDINATOR, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. 3.THE DISTRICT WATER MANAGEMENT AGENCY, REP. BY ITS PROJECT DIRECTOR, ANANTAPUR, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. 4.THE MANDAL PARISHAD DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, ANANTAPUR RURAL MANDAL, ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ, One in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 2nd respondent proceedings in R.C. No. 09/H.R/F.A/Anantapur/14, dated 26-11-2014 is illegal, arbitrary and violation of principles of natural justice and consequently set aside the same IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 48690 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay in R.C.No.09/H.R/F.A/Anantapur/14, dated 26-11-2014 direct the respondent to continue the petitioner as Filed Assistant to Kamarupalli Village, Anantapur Rural Mandal, Anantapur District Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.M KARIBASAIAH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 2.GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV (AP) The Court made the following: 2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION No.38864 OF 2014 ORDER : 1. The learned Standing Counsel for the respondent No.3 submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive, as the petitioner has challenged the suspension proceedings dated 26.11.2014. 2. It is further submitted that the respondents have passed final orders in the month of December, 2016 and therefore the cause in the writ petition no longer survives. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Dated 16.03.2026 KGM 3 81 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION No.38864 OF 2014 Dated 16.03.2026 KGM