Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 28530 (JHR)

VISHAL KUMAR @ VISHAL KUMAR MISHRA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./9525/2026 · 2026-10-09

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:30335] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.9525 of 2026 ------ Vishal Kumar @ Vishal Kumar Mishra, aged about 19 years, son of Lalitesh Mishra @ Lalitesh Kumar, resident of Road No.15, Adityapur-2, P.O. Adityapur, P.S.- RIT, District- Seraikella Kharsawan .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Jitendra Nath Upadhyay, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated-09-10-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with R.I.T. P.S. Case No.22 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Section 126(2), 118(1), 118(2), 109, 308(5), 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner, in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons, attempted to murder Prem Chandra Verma consequent upon refusal by him to pay the extortion, with a chopper causing him injuries. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is further submitted that the nature of injuries sustained by the victim is simple in nature as is mentioned in paragraph-91 of the case- diary. It is next submitted that though charge-sheet has already been submitted but no witness has been examined as yet. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 01.07.2026 as has been mentioned in para-14 of the instant bail application. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Seraikella in connection with R.I.T. P.S. Case No.22 of 2026 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case, furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated-09.10.2026-Animesh/