13.02.2026 Item No.15 Ct.No.05 b.das Reject IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CIRCUIT BENCH AT JALPAIGURI CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION C.R.M. (A) 56 of 2026 In Re : An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure read with Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Sahebganj Police Station Case No. 231 of 2025 dated 28.04.2025 under Sections 20(b) (ii)(c)/29 of the NDPS Act. And In Re : Anarul Hoque @ Anarul Mia @ Batul ... Petitioner Mr. Hillol Saha Podder Ms. Mousumi Das ... for the Petitioner Mr. Nilay Chakraborty Mr. Kallol Nag ... for the State Heard learned counsels for the parties. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no narcotic substance was recovered from the petitioner and his name transpired from the statement of the co accused. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer. I have considered the material on record. Though no narcotic substance appears to have been seized from the possession of the petitioner, the petitioner was present at the spot at the time of search and seizure and has been identified by the local witnesses. In view of the statutory restrictions laid down under Section 37 of the NDPS Act, prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. 2 The application being CRM (A) 56 of 2026 is disposed of. Case Diary be returned. Urgent certified website copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Suvra Ghosh, J.)