Smt. Chekuri Jyothi @ Datalla Jyothi v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/15293/2026 · 2026-06-15
Maheswara Rao Kuncheam
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2853 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2853 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010290432026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] TUESDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 15293/2026 Between:
1. SMT. CHEKURI JYOTHI @ DATALLA JYOTHI, D/O. CHEKURI MURALI RAJU, AGED ABOUT 45YEARS, OCC HOME MAKER, R/O D.NO. 3- 76, MALIKIPURAM, MUDUNURI VANI MERAKA, MALIKIPURAM MANDAL, AMBEDKAR KONASEEMA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI.522237
2. THE SUPERINTENDENT/DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KOTHAPETASUB-DIVISION,
AMBEDKAR KONASEEMA DISTRICT.533223
3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER/SUBINSPECTOR OF POLICE, MALKIPURAM POLICE STATION, AMBEDKAR KONASEEMA DISTRICT-533253. 4. GUNDUPOGULA ANNAVARAM, R/O MALIKIPURAM VILLAGE AND MANDAL, AMBEDKAR KONASEEMA DISTRICT. 533253
5. GUNDUPOGULA KIRAN, R/O MALIKIPURAM VILLAGE AND MANDAL, AMBEDKAR KONASEEMA DISTRICT.533253
6. ELAVALA SRINIVAS, R/O MERIPODU VINAYAKA SWAMY TEMPLE ROAD, MORIPODU,
MALIKIPURAM MANDAL, AMBEDKAR KONASEEMA DISTRICT- 533250
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be
2
pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action inaction of Respondent Nos.2 and 3 in not registering FIR on the basis of the petitioners complaint dated 17-05-2026 and the endorsement/reference made by the DSP on 18.05.2026, despite disclosure of cognizable offences, as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to law consequently directing Respondent Nos.2 and 3 to forthwith receive and register the petitioners complaint as FIR, if not already registered, and conduct fair, impartial and expeditious investigation in accordance with law directing Respondent Nos.2 and 3 to consider and provide necessary police protection to the petitioner and her family in view of the specific threat to life pleaded in the complaint and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct Respondent Nos.2 and 3 to immediately act on my complaint, afford necessary police protection, and file a status report before this Hon'ble Court, in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. DEVARAM SRIHARI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.
GP FOR HOME The Court made the following:
3
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 15293 of 2026 ORDER:-
The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of Constitution of India seeking the following main prayer:
“….to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action inaction of Respondent Nos.2 and 3 in not registering FIR on the basis of the petitioners complaint dated 17-05-2026 and the endorsement/reference made by the DSP on 18.05.2026, despite disclosure of cognizable offences, as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to law consequently directing Respondent Nos.2 and 3 to forthwith receive and register the petitioners complaint as FIR, if not already registered, and conduct fair, impartial and expeditious investigation in accordance with law directing Respondent Nos.2 and 3 to consider and provide necessary police protection to the petitioner and her family in view of the specific threat to life pleaded in the complaint and pass….”
2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri D.Srihari, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that in view of the subsequent events taken place in the lis, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for further adjudication. Accordingly, he submits that the matter has become infructuous. 3. Recording the above said submissions, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. ____________________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 16.06.2026 RMR
4
51
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM
WRIT PETITION No.15293 of 2026
Date: 16.06.2026
RMR