APHC010829972018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3369] WEDNESDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 3040/2018 Between: 1. JASTHI SRIKANTH, OCC- BUSINESS, R/O. D. NO. 1-140-2, PONNAVARAM VILLAGE, VEERULA PAADU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS, REP BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, HYDERABAD. 2. KIKURI SATISH REDDY, REPRESENTING M/S. VIYAN SILKS PVT. LTD., IN THE CAPACITY OF ITS MANAGING PARTNER AND AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY, OFFICE SITUATED AT D. NO. 30-15- 150, ALLIPURAM WARD, DABAGARDENS, VISAKHAPATNAM CITY, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT 3. GOGIREDDY MANASA REDDY, REPRESENTING M/S. VIYAN SILKS PVT. LTD., IN THE CAPACITY OF ITS MANAGING PARTNER AND AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY, OFFICE SITUATED AT D. NO. 30-15- 150, ALLIPURAM WARD, DABAGARDENS, VISAKHAPATNAM CITY, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT 4. M/S VIYAN SILKS PVT LTD, IN THE CAPACITY OF ITS MANAGING PARTNER AND AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY, OFFICE SITUATED AT D. NO. 30-15-150, ALLIPURAM WARD, DABAGARDENS, VISAKHAPATNAM CITY, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. NIMMAGADDA SATYANARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. AISHWARYA NAGULA 2. T PRADYUMNA KUMAR REDDY 3. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: 3 O R D E R 1. This Criminal Revision Case has been filed by the petitioner/complainant under Sections 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, ‘the Cr.P.C.’) against the order dated 23.10.2018 passed in Crl.M.P.No.1725 of 2018 in C.C.No.185 of 2017 on the file of the learned Principal Judicial Magistrate of First Class-cum-Metropolitan Magistrate, Vijayawada (for short, ‘the trial Court’). 2. Heard and perused the record. 3. As seen from the record, the Crl.M.P.No.1725 of 2018 has been filed by the petitioner/complainant herein under Section 319 of Cr.P.C to add M/s. Viyyan Silks Private Limited, Visakhpatnam as accused No.3 in this case and issue summons for taking cognizance of offence against accused No.3. By order dated 23.10.2018, the trial Court dismissed the petition. Against the said order, the petitioner herein preferred the revision. 4. A report was received from the Principal District Judge, Krishna, Machilipatnam. In the report, the learned Magistrate submitted that C.C.No.185 of 2017 was disposed of by acquitting accused Nos.1 and 2 under Section 255(1) of Criminal Procedure Code. In view of the disposal of C.C.No.185 of 2017, this Court finds that the cause does not survive for adjudication and the matter would become infructuous. 5. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous. Interim orders granted earlier, if any, shall stand vacated and the miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________________ JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO Date: 07.01.2026 SR 4 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.3040 of 2018 Date: 07.01.2026 SR