Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010911632018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] THURSDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI
WRIT PETITION NO: 45574/2018
Between:
1. S RAMA KRISHNA, S/O. S. PEDDAMALLAPPA, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, OCC. JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE (U/S) H. NO. 13-4-87, 1ST FLOOR, VIKASNAGAR, DILSUKHNAGAR, HYDERABAD, T.S. 500060. ...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI AMARAVATHI GUNTER DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KADAPA, Y.S.R.
KADAPA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, RAYACHOTY URBAN POLICE STATION, RAYACHOTY, Y.S.R. KADAPA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 4. SRI K V RAMANAIAH, S/O. NARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, JUNIOR ASSISTANT, ADDITIONAL JUNIOR CIVIL JUDGE COURT, RAYACHOTY, PRESENTLY WORKING AT KAMALAPURAM, Y.S.R. KADAPA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 5. SMT D R LAXMI DEVI, W/O. Y. NAGIREDDI, JUNIOR ASSISTANT, PRESENTLY WORKING AT -SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE COURT, RAYACHOTY, Y.S.R. KADAPA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...RESPONDENT(S):
2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 3rd Respondent in not following the procedure contemplated in Sec. 173 of Cr. P.C. in Crime No. 57/2013 of Rayachoty Urban Police Station, Y.S.R. Kadapa District, as illegal, improper, unjust, arbitrary and violation of Article 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 3rd Respondent to file report as per Section 173 of Cr. P.C. in. Crime No. 57/2013 and pass
IA NO: 1 OF 2018
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3rd Respondent to file report as per Sec. 173 of Cr.P.C. in Cr.No.57/2013, Rayachoty Urban Police Station, Y.S.R.Kadapa District as early as possible preferably with in a period of six weeks pending writ petition and pass
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. PARTY IN PERSON
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME (AP)
The Court made the following:
3
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI
WRIT PETITION No.45574 OF 2018 ORDER:
Party-in-person absent, though the matter is posted under the caption ‘For Dismissal’.
Earlier also, there was no representation for the writ petitioner. He was absent on the previous adjournments also. 2. Sri R.Mallikarjuna Rao, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home already submitted that police completed investigation and laid final report before the learned Magistrate on 14.12.2018 referring the case as ‘false’, and accordingly, a notice was also issued to the writ petitioner on 03.08.2019, and in that view of the matter, the writ petition is not maintainable in law. 3. In the light of above facts and circumstances, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 08.01.2026 Pmk
4
08 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI
WRIT PETITION No:45574 OF 2018
Date: 08.01.2026
Pmk