Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 28524 (AP)

Ancha Prem Deep v. Kota Sridevi

AS/2110/2018 · 2026-02-23

Balaji Medamalli, Ravi Nath Tilhari

Original Suitbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010944842018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI APPEAL SUIT NO: 2110/2018 Between: 1. ANCHA PREM DEEP, S/O NARASIMHA RAO AGED ABOUT 21 YRS, OCC. STUDENT R/O H.NO.13 AND MANDAL KRISHNA DISTRICT PRESENTLY RESIDING AT NO.361, ZHONGSHAN EAST ROAD PROVINCE, CHINA REP. BY HIS GPA HOLDER ANCHA NATHANIEL @ NARASIMHA RAO @ CHITTI BABU S/O VENKATESWAR RAO AGED ABOUT 54YRS R/O H.NO.13 VILLAGE AND MANDAL KRISHNA DISTRICT KRISHNA 1. KOTA SRIDEVI, W/O VENKATA SIVA SATYA SURESH AGED ABOUT 38YRS R/O FLAT NO.306, VIJAYA SATYA RESIDENCY HYDERABAD HYDERABAD 2. CHERUKURI USHA RANI, W/O NAGABHUSHANAM AGED ABOUT 38YRS R/O FLAT NO.306, VIJAYA SATYA RESIDENCY HYDERABAD Aggrieved by the decree and judgment in O.S.No.53/2014, dt.13 2017 on the file of the XVI Addtional District and Sessions Judge, Krishna District at Nandigama, the appellant filed this Memorandum of First Appeal on the following IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI APPEAL SUIT NO: 2110/2018 ANCHA PREM DEEP, S/O NARASIMHA RAO AGED ABOUT 21 YRS, OCC. STUDENT R/O H.NO.13-126, KANCHIKACHERLA VILLAGE AND MANDAL KRISHNA DISTRICT PRESENTLY RESIDING AT NO.361, ZHONGSHAN EAST ROAD SHIJIAZHUANG CITY HEBI PROVINCE, CHINA REP. BY HIS GPA HOLDER ANCHA NATHANIEL @ NARASIMHA RAO @ CHITTI BABU S/O VENKATESWAR RAO AGED ABOUT 54YRS R/O H.NO.13-126, KANCHIKACHERLA VILLAGE AND MANDAL KRISHNA DISTRICT KRISHNA ...APPELLANT AND KOTA SRIDEVI, W/O VENKATA SIVA SATYA SURESH AGED ABOUT 38YRS R/O FLAT NO.306, VIJAYA SATYA RESIDENCY HYDERABAD HYDERABAD CHERUKURI USHA RANI, W/O NAGABHUSHANAM AGED ABOUT 38YRS R/O FLAT NO.306, VIJAYA SATYA RESIDENCY ...RESPONDENT(S Aggrieved by the decree and judgment in O.S.No.53/2014, dt.13 2017 on the file of the XVI Addtional District and Sessions Judge, Krishna District at Nandigama, the appellant filed this Memorandum of First Appeal on IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3572] TUESDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI ANCHA PREM DEEP, S/O NARASIMHA RAO AGED ABOUT 21 YRS, 126, KANCHIKACHERLA VILLAGE AND MANDAL KRISHNA DISTRICT PRESENTLY RESIDING AT SHIJIAZHUANG CITY HEBI PROVINCE, CHINA REP. BY HIS GPA HOLDER ANCHA NATHANIEL @ NARASIMHA RAO @ CHITTI BABU S/O VENKATESWAR RAO 126, KANCHIKACHERLA ...APPELLANT KOTA SRIDEVI, W/O VENKATA SIVA SATYA SURESH AGED ABOUT 38YRS R/O FLAT NO.306, VIJAYA SATYA RESIDENCY CHERUKURI USHA RANI, W/O NAGABHUSHANAM AGED ABOUT 38YRS R/O FLAT NO.306, VIJAYA SATYA RESIDENCY ...RESPONDENT(S): Aggrieved by the decree and judgment in O.S.No.53/2014, dt.13-12- 2017 on the file of the XVI Addtional District and Sessions Judge, Krishna District at Nandigama, the appellant filed this Memorandum of First Appeal on IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To condone the delay of 271 days in filing the AS in the interest of justice. IA NO: 2 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the CPA holder to represent the petitioner in the Appeal suit filed against the judgment and decree in OS no.53/2014,dt. 13-12-2017 on the file of the XVI Additional district and sessions judge, Krishna district at Nandigama in the interest of justice. IA NO: 3 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in pursuant to the judgment and decree in OS no.53/2014,dt. 13-12-2017 on the file of the XVI Additional district and Sessions judge, Krishna district at Nandigama including the further proceedings in EP no.9/2018 pending disposal of the appeal in the interest of justice IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to permit the Petitioners/Respondents/Plaintiffs to withdraw the amount of Rs.16,60,000/- which was deposited in pursuance of the Decree and Judgement in O.S.No. 53 of 2014 on the file of VIth Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Nandigama, Krishna Dist., pending disposal of the Appeal and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to vacate the interim order dated 02-01-2019 in I.A.No.3/2018 in A.S.No. 2110/2018 in the interest of justice and pass Counsel for the Appellant: 1. P NAGENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. K V BHANU PRASAD The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI APPEAL SUIT NO: 2110/2018 JUDGMENT:- (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari) The appeal was filed by the defendant. The plaintiffs’ suit for specific performance of contract was decreed directing the defendant to execute the registered sale deed, as also with some other observations and directions. 2. Sri P.Nagendra Reddy, learned counsel for the appellant has submitted a letter dated 19.02.2026 to the Registrar (Judicial), Andhra Pradesh High Court, on record submitting as follows: “Due to change of circumstances, the Appellant is inclined to withdraw the above Appeal suit. It is therefore requested that this Hon’ble Authority may be pleased to direct the concerned section to post A.S.No.2110/2018 before the concerned court under the caption of “withdrawal” enabling the Appellant to withdraw the A.S.No.2110/2018 with a liberty to file fresh appeal if the issue is not resolved.” 3. Sri Partha Saradhi Reddy, learned counsel representing Sri P.Nagendra Reddy, learned counsel for the appellant submits that the Appeal Suit be dismissed as withdrawn. 4. Sri K.Peri Naidu, learned counsel representing Sri K.V.Bhanu Prasad, learned counsel for the respondents has no objection. 5. In view of the above, the Appeal Suit is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall also stand closed. ___________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI,J ____________________ BALAJI MEDAMALLI,J Dated:24.02.2026 AG THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI APPEAL SUIT NO: 2110/2018 Dated:24.02.2026 AG