Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 28523 (AP)

Shri Shakti LPG Ltd v. Government of Andhra Pradesh

WP/39484/2018 · 2026-01-21

Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010819602018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No. BETWEEN: 1. SHRI SHAKTI LPG LTD, CORPORATE OFFICE SITUATED AT VENUS PLAZA, BEGUMPET, HYDERABAD REP BY IT CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, D.V.MANOHAR, S/O.D.APPA RAO, AGED 65 YEARS 1. GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. SECRETARY TRANSPORT, ROADS AND BUILDINGS(PORTS) DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE PORT OFFICER FAC, PORT DEPARTMENT, KAKINADA PORT, KAKINADA, E.G DISTRICT, A.P. 3. DIRECTOR OF EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, A.P. Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus or any other Writ, declaring the action of the respondents in issuing Notice No PC/EW IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No. 39484/2018 SHRI SHAKTI LPG LTD, CORPORATE OFFICE SITUATED AT VENUS PLAZA, BEGUMPET, HYDERABAD REP BY IT CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, D.V.MANOHAR, S/O.D.APPA RAO, AGED 65 YEARS ...PETITIONER AND GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TRANSPORT, ROADS AND BUILDINGS(PORTS) DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH. THE PORT OFFICER FAC, PORT DEPARTMENT, KAKINADA PORT, KAKINADA, E.G DISTRICT, A.P. DIRECTOR OF PORTS, ANDHRA PRADESH, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, A.P. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus or any other Writ, declaring the action of the respondents in issuing Notice No PC/EW IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3330] THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JANUARY THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO SHRI SHAKTI LPG LTD, CORPORATE OFFICE SITUATED AT VENUS PLAZA, BEGUMPET, HYDERABAD REP BY IT CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, D.V.MANOHAR, ...PETITIONER BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TRANSPORT, ROADS AND BUILDINGS(PORTS) DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH. THE PORT OFFICER FAC, PORT DEPARTMENT, KAKINADA PORTS, ANDHRA PRADESH, KAKINADA, ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus or any other Writ, declaring the action of the respondents in issuing Notice No PC/EW- 2 L2/414/2003 dated 23.10.2018 to resume the land (6.26 Acres) allotted in favor of the petitioner company at Kakinada Anchorage Port on 05- 11-2018 by conducting a Panchanama as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and set aside the same and consequentially direct the respondents not to demand rents as per G.O.Ms.No.64 dated 04.05.1999, G.O.Ms.No.140 dated.14-08-2003 and G.O.Ms.No.46 dated.27.04.2004 and pass such other order or orders…. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. T PRADYOTH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GINJUPALLI SUBBA RAO 2. GP FOR ROADS BUILDINGS (AP) The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: Learned counsel on record for the petitioner appeared through virtual mode and stated that nothing survives in the present Writ Petition for adjudication and the Writ Petition is rendered infructuous by efflux of time. The same is witnessed by Sri P. Chaitanya, learned counsel, who appeared before the Court in item No.83 on today i.e. 22.01.2026. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 22.01.2026 Harin 4 154 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHARA RAO W.P.No. 39484 OF 2018 Date: 22-01-2026 Harin