Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 28522 (AP)

NADIMPALLI SATYANARAYANA RAJU & ANOTHER v. NADIMPALLI SURYANARAYANA RAJU

CMA/129/2016 · 2026-01-05

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam, Ravi Nath Tilhari

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010811842016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3524] TUESDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 129/2016 Between: 1. NADIMPALLI SATYANARAYANA RAJU & ANOTHER, S/O SURYANARAYANA RAJU, I.D.P.L COOPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY, VASANTH NAGAR, HYDERABAD, R.R.DISTRICT, MIYAPUR, JCJC. 2. NADIMPALLI SRIKARA VARMA, BEING MINOR REP BY 1ST APPELLANT BEING NEXT FRIEND AND NATURAL GUARDIAN ...APPELLANT(S) AND 1. NADIMPALLI SURYANARAYANA RAJU, S/o Satyanarayana Raju, age 78 years, Retired Employee in Veterinary Department, D No.4-24, Rangapuram, H/o Samansa Village, Amalapuram, Rural Mandal, Amalapuram JCJC ...RESPONDENT Appeal Under Section_____against ordersaggrieved by the order and decree of the II Addl Dist Judge, Amalapuram East Godavari District made in O.P No.98 of 2015 dt.13.11.2015 IA NO: 2 OF 2016(CMAMP 8023 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Appellant(S): 1. PRUDHVI RAJ MUDUNURI Counsel for the Respondent: 1. The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 129/2016 JUDGMENT: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari) The petition filed by the father – appellant No.1 to recognise him as guardian to the minor child – appellant No.2 and permit him to sell the schedule property for the benefit of the minor child under Guardian and Wards Act was dismissed by the learned II Additional District & Sessions Judge, Amalapuram. Aggrieved by the same, the present appeal has been filed. 2. There is no representation for the appellant. 3. The matter pertains to the year 2016 and is listed under the caption ‘old matters’. 4. In view of the above, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed for ‘want of prosecution’. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall also stand closed. ____________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI,J _____________________________ MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM,J Dated: 06.01.2026 AG 229 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 129/2016 Dated: 06.01.2026 AG