Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 28521 (AP)

Vemuri Sivaji v. The state of Andhra Pradesh

WP/40761/2018 · 2026-02-16

Sumathi Jagadam

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010845932018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] TUESDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 40761/2018 Between: 1. VEMURI SIVAJI, S/O VEERAYYA, HINDU, AGED ABOUT. 62 YEARS OCCUPATION. RETIRED EMPLOYEE, R/O H NO. 1-124, VIDYANAGAR GANNAVARARN-521101 KRISHNA DISTRICT. A P ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT FOR WOMEN, CHILDREN, DISABLED AND SENIOR CITIZENS(DW) AT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, BUNDAR, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. THE SUB DIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICER, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 4. SMT VEMURI RAJYA LAKSHMI, W/O LATE VEERAYYA, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 82YEARS, OCCUPATION HOUSE WIFE R/O H NO 23/217A, BATCHUPETA, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 5. VEMURI MADHAVI, W/O TATHINENI SESHAGIRI RAO, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 63YEARS, OCCUPATION. RETD EMPLOYEE R/O H NO 23/217A, BATCHUPETA, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue Writ or Order more particularly one in the nature of Writ of mandamus declaring the impugned orders dated 06-08-2018 in Rc.B1.257/2018 issued by 2nd respondent as illegal, arbitrary without jurisdiction and violation of Principles of Natural Justice and Article 14 of Constitution of India and consequently set aside the same and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in pursuance of the orders dated 06-08- 2018 in Rc.B1.257/2018 issued by 2nd respondent pending disposal of the above Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. CH B R P SEKHAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 2. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 3. AMBADIPUDI SATYANARAYANA 3 The Court made the following ORDER: Sri Sk. Sardam Hussain, learned counsel, representing Sri Ch. B.R.P. Sekhar, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Recording the submission of learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 17.02.2026 KAS 4 153 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 40761/2018 Dated: 17.02.2026 KAS