APHC010897662018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 43353/2018 Between: 1. KOLLI PEDDI RAJU,, S/O. VENKATESHWARLU AGED 55 YEARS, OCC- PISCICULTURE R/O. CHINNATADINADA VILLAGE, KALIDINDI MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, GUDIVADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT 4. THE TAHSILDHAR, KALIDINDI MANDAL KRISHNA DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent No.4 for trying to evict the petitioner from land to an extent of Ac. 0.81 cnts in Sy. 178, Thadinada, Kalidindi Mandal, Krishna District without following the due process of law is bad, illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, contrary and voilation of principle of natural justice and consequently direct the Respondents No.4 not 2 to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of said land in the interest of justice and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of eviction of petitioner from land to an extent of Ac. 0.81 cnts in Sy. 178, Thadinada, Kalidindi Mandal, Krishna District, pending disposal of the above writ petition, in the interest of justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K SAI MOHAN RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR ASSIGNMENT (AP) 3 The Court made the following ORDER: Though the matter was adjourned on 18.02.2026 and 25.02.2026, there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption “for dismissal”. Today when the matter is called, there is no representation for the petitioner. It appears that the learned counsel for the petitioner is not interested to argue the case. Therefore, the Writ Petition is dismissed as non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. Interim order granted earlier shall stand vacated. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 26.02.2026 KAS 4 154 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 43353/2018 Dated: 26.02.2026 KAS