Smt. Korni Meenakshi v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/42120/2018 · 2026-02-19
Sumathi Jagadam
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 28515 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 28515 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010871942018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] FRIDAY,THE TWENTIETH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 42120/2018 Between:
1. SMT. KORNI MEENAKSHI, W/O KORNI VARA PRASAD, AGED 38 YEARS, OCC HOUSEWIFE, R/O D.NO. 9-24-8/1, PRANATHOSINI APARTMENT, CBM COMPOUND, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH. -
2. SMT K. BALATHRIPURA SUNDARI, W/O. K. SATYANARAYANA, AGE. 40 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE WIFE, R/O. D.NO.. 9-24-8/1, PRANATHOSINI APARTMENT, CBM COMPOUND, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. G. BALATHRIPURA SUNDARI, W/O. S. VENKATA VARAHALABABU, AGED. 30 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE WIFE, R/O. D.NO.. 9-24-8/1, PRANATHOSINI APARTMENT, CBM COMPOUND, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH. 4. KORNI HARSHAVARDHAN SIMHARDI YADAV, S/O. KORNI VARA PRASAD, AGE. 18 YEARS, OCC. STUDENT, R/O. D.NO.. 9-24-8/1, PRANATHOSINI APARTMENT, CBM COMPOUND, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (STAMPS AND REGISTRATION DEPARTMENT) AT
2 JS, J W.P.No.42120/2018
A.P SECRETARIAT BUILDING, VELAGAPUDI AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE DIRECTOR, AND INSPECTOR GENERAL OF REGISTRATION AND STAMPS ANDHRA PRADESH AT EDUPUGALLU, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH
3. THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL, OF REGISTRATION AND STAMPS VISAKHAPATNAM VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT530 001
4. THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR STAMPS AND REGISTRATION DEPARTMENT, VISHAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH. 5. THE SUBREGISTRAR, ANANDAPURAM, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH. 6. K TULASI DAS, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, OCC. 3T. SUB-REGISTRAR-31, NAKKAPALLI, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH. 7. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (REVENUE DEPARTMENT) AT A.P SECRETARIAT BUILDING, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH. 8. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, AT VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH. 9. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, NARSIPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH. 10. THE TAHSILDAR, S. RAYVARAM, S. RAYAVARAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH. 11. K VENUGOPAL, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONERS, OCC. THAHASILDAR (MRO), 0/0. S. RAYAVARAM, S. RAYAVARAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH. 12. THE SUBINSPECTOR OF POLICE, S. RAYAVARAM POLICE STATION, S. RAYAVARAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT,
3 JS, J W.P.No.42120/2018
STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH. 13. SMT EEGALA BANGARU PAPA, W/O. NAGESWARA RAO, AGED. 28 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEWIFE, R/O. GURRAJUPETA, GUDIVDA POST, S. RAYAVARAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH. 14.
EEGALA NAGESWARA RAO, S/O. E. KONDAIAH, AGED ABOUT. 32 YEARS, OCC. POLITICIAN AND AGRICULTURE, R/O. GURRAJUPETA VILLAGE, S. RAYAVARAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH. 15. MYLAPALLY GANESH, S/O. LATE M. VENKANNA, AGED ABOUT. 43 YEARS, OCC. NOT KNOWN, NIO. PEDA THEENARLA VILLAGE AND POST, NAKKAPALLY MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, STATE OF A.P. R/O. D.NO. P/555, PAILAN COLONY, NAGARJUNA SAGAR, NALGONDA DISTRICT, STATE OF TELANGANA, GURRAJUPET, GUDIVADA POST, S. RAYAVARAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
16. KURAMDASU SRINIVAS, S/O. LATE K. VENKATA RAMANA, AGED ABOUT. 40 YEARS OCC. POLITICIAN PRESENTLY WORKING AS PANCHAYAT PRESIDENT, RIO. GURRAJUPETA VILLAGE, S.
RAYAVARAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH. 17. KURAMDASU KOTABABU, S/O,LATE K. VENKATA RAMANA, AGED ABOUT. 37 YEARS, OA. POLITICIAN AND BUSINESS, R/O. GURRAJUPETA VILLAGE, S. RAYAVARAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH. 18. KURAMDAS APPA RAO, S/O. LATE K. APPANNA, AGED ABOUT. 55 YEARS, OCC. POLITICIAN AND CULTIVATION, R/O. R/O. GURRAJUPETA VILLAGE, S. RAYAVARAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ in the nature of Writ of mandamus or any other appropriate Writ direction or order declaring the action of the 5th Respondent
4 JS, J W.P.No.42120/2018
coperated to the 14th respondent by issuing different Revenue Khata Numbers i.e. 1424 and 1609 with the influence of the 15th respondent for the purpose of registraring the disupted lands by removing the disputed Sy.Nos. 153/4B (New Sy. No. 180/1), 202/4, 202/1, 202/3, from the 1 B Revnue Records as per the directioon of the 15th respondent out of the disputed survey numbers maintianed in 1-B Revenue Record as 153-4B to an extent of Ac. 2-00, 170-1 to an extent of Ac. 0.6 Cents, 170-2 to an extent of Ac. 0.52 Cents, 201-1 to an extent of Ac. 0.010 Cents, 201/4 to an extent of Ac.
0.18 Cents, 202-1 to an extent of Ac. 0.59 Cents, 202-12 to an extent of Ac. 0.25 Cents, 202-3 to an extent of Ac. 0.25 Cents, 202-9 to an extent of Ac. 0.25 Cents situated at Gurrajupet Village, S. Rayavarm Mandal, Visakhapatnam District herein as illegal, arbitrary and void and direct the Respndent Nos. 1 to 6 not to entertain any kind of registration in respect of disputed Survey Numbers as mentioned in 1-B Revenue Records vide Sy Nos. 153-4B (New Sy. No. 180/1 to an extent of Ac. 1.84 Cents) to an extent of Ac. 2-00, 170-1 to an extent of Ac. 0.6 Cents, 170-2 to an extent of Ac. 0.52 Cents, 201-1 to an extent of Ac. 0.010 Cents, 201/4 to an extent of Ac. 0.18 Cents, 202-1 to an extent of Ac. 0.59 Cents, 202-12 to an extent of Ac. 0.25 Cents, 202-3 to an extent of Ac. 0.25 Cents, 202-9 to an extent of Ac. 20.25 Cents situated at Gurrajupet Village, S. Rayavarm Mandal, Visakhapatnam District and also direct the Respondent Nos. 9 and 10 to maintain the 1-B Revenue Records before the date of 07-08-2017 as disputed survey vide Sy. No.153-4B(New Sy. No.180/1 to an extent of Ac. 1.84 Cents) to an extent of Ac. 2-00, 170-1 to an extent of Ac. 0.6 Cents, 170-2 to an extent of Ac. 0.52 Cents, 201-1 to an extent of Ac. 0.010 Cents, 201/4 to an extent of Ac. 0.18 Cents, 202-1 to an extent of Ac. 0.59 Cents, 202-12 to an extent of Ac. 0.25 Cents, 202-3 to an extent of Ac. 0.25 Cents, 202-9 to an extent of Ac. 0.25 Cents situated at Gurrajupet Village, S. Rayavarm Mandal, Visakhapatnam District and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to, direct the Respondent Nos.
9 and 10 to maintain the Survey Numbers as mentioned 1-B Revenue Records before the date i.e. 07-08-2017 as disputed survey numbers vide Sy. No.153-4B(New Sy.No.180/1 to an extent of Ac. 1.84 Cents) to an extent of Ac. 2-00, 170-1 to an extent of Ac. 0.6 Cents, 170-2 to an extent of Ac. 0.52 Cents, 201-1 to an extent of Ac. 0.010 Cents, 201/4 to an extent of Ac. 0.18 Cents, 2024 to an extent of Ac. 0.59 Cents, 202-12 to an
5 JS, J W.P.No.42120/2018
extent of Ac. 0.25 Cents, 202-3 to an extent of Ac. D.25 Cents, 202-9 to an extent of Ac. 0.25 Cents situated at Gurrajupet Village, S. Rayavarm Mandal, Visakhapatnam District pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respndent Nos. 1 to 6 not to entertain any kind of registration in respect of disputed Survey Numbers as mentioned in 1-B Revenue Records vide Sy Nos. 153 -4B (New Sy. No. 180/1 to an extent of Ac. 1.8 Cents) to an extent of Ac. 2-00, 170-1 to an extent o Ac. 0.6 Cents, 170-2 to an extent of Ac. 0.52 Cen 201-1 to an extent of Ac. 0.010 Cents, 201/4 to extent of Ac. 0.18 Cents, 202-1 to an extent of 0.59 Cents, 202-12 to an extent of Ac. 0.25 Cen 202-3 to an extent of Ac. 0.25 Cents, 202-9 to extent of Ac.
0.25 Cents situated at Gurraju Village, S. Rayavarm Mandal, Visakhapatnam Di pending disposal of the above writ petition an pass IA NO: 3 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ in the nature of Writ of mandamus or any other appropriate Writ direction or order declaring the action of the 5th Respondent is entertaining the registration's on disputed Survey Numbers mentioned in Respondent Nos. 9 and 1-B Revenue Records vide Sy Nos. 153-4B (New Sy. No. 180/1 to an extent of Ac. 1.84 Cents) to an extent of Ac. 2-00, 170-1 to an extent of Ac. 0.6 Cents, 170-2 to an extent of Ac. 0.52 Cents, 201-1 to an extent of Ac. 0.010 Cents, 201/4 to an extent of Ac. 0.18 Cents, 202-1 to an extent of Ac. 0.59 Cents, 202-12 to an extent of Ac. 0.25 Cents, 202-3 to an extent of Ac. 0.25 Cents, 202-9 to an extent of Ac. 20.25 Cents situated at Gurrajupet Village, S. Rayavarm Mandal, Visakhapatnam District without considering the Representation maded by the petitioner on 27-04-2017 and legal notice issued on 04-05-2017 on the influence of the 16th Respondent herein is illegal arbitrary and also oppose to all cannons of Principles of Natural Justice and direct the Respondent Nos. 1 to 6 herein not to entertaing any kind of registrations in respect of disputed Survey Numbers as mentioned in as mentioned in Respondent Nos. 9 and 10th 1-B Revenue Records vide Sy Nos. 153-4B (New Sy. No. 180/1 to an extent of Ac. 1.84 Cents) to an extent of Ac.2- 00, 170-1 to an extent of Ac. 0.6 Cents, 170-2 to an extent of Ac. 0.52
6 JS, J W.P.No.42120/2018
Cents, 201-1 to an extent of Ac. 0.010 Cents, 201/4 to an extent of Ac.
0.18 Cents, 202-1 to an extent of Ac. 0.59 Cents, 202-12 to an extent of Ac. 0.25 Cents, 202-3 to an extent of Ac. 0.25 Cents, 202-9 to an extent of Ac. 20.25 Cents situated at Gurrajupet Village, S. Rayavarm Mandal, Visakhapatnam District and also direct the Respondent Nos. 9 and 10 to maintain the 1-B Revenue Records before the date of 07-08-2017 as disputed survey vide Sy. No.153-4B(New Sy. No.180/1 to an extent of Ac. 1.84 Cents) to an extent of Ac. 2-00, 170-1 to an extent of Ac. 0.6 Cents, 170-2 to an extent of Ac. 0.52 Cents, 201-1 to an extent of Ac. 0.010 Cents, 201/4 to an extent of Ac. 0.18 Cents, 202-1 to an extent of Ac. 0.59 Cents, 202-12 to an extent of Ac. 0.25 Cents, 202-3 to an extent of Ac. 0.25 Cents, 202-9 to an extent of Ac. 0.25 Cents situated at Gurrajupet Village, S. Rayavarm Mandal, Visakhapatnam District and also direct the Respondent Nos. 9 and 10 to maintain the 1-B Revenue Records basing on information received by the Special Investigation Team (SIT) vide Rc.No. 1440/2017/C.S/. dated 16-08-2017 relating to in vide Sy Nos. 153-4B (New Sy. No. 180/1 to an extent of Ac. 1.84 Cents) to an extent of Ac. 2-00, 170-1 to an extent of Ac. 0.6 Cents, 170-2 to an extent of Ac. 0.52 Cents, 201-1 to an extent of Ac. 0.010 Cents, 201/4 to an extent of Ac. 0.18 Cents, 202-1 to an extent of Ac. 0.59 Cents, 202-12 to an extent of Ac. 0.25 Cents, 202-3 to an extent of Ac. 0.25 Cents, 202-9 to an extent of Ac. 20.25 Cents situated at Gurrajupet—Village, S. Rayavarm Mandal, Visakhapatnam District without removing the any single survey number on influence of the 16th respondent misusing their official powers for illegal purpose for creating subsequent litigation in future and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. SESHAGIRIRAO YALAMANCHILI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME (AP)
2. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)
3.
GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS (AP)
4. CH LAXMI NARAYANA
5. M BALASUBRAHMANYAM
7 JS, J W.P.No.42120/2018
The Court made the following ORDER:
When the matter was listed on 19.02.2026, there was no representation on behalf of the learned counsel for the petitioners. Therefore, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption “for dismissal”. Today when the matter is called, there is no representation for the petitioners. It appears that the learned counsel for the petitioners is not interested to prosecute the case. Therefore, the Writ Petition is dismissed as non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 20.02.2026 rsd
8 JS, J W.P.No.42120/2018
94
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM
WRIT PETITION NO: 42120/2018
Date: 20.02.2026 rsd