APHC010836202017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3206] SATURDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 35531/2017 Between: 1. SANGA SUDHAKAR DIED, S/O. NARAYANAPPA, AGED AOUT 64 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. H.NO.1-781, MUDIGUBBA VILLAGE, MUDIGUBBA MANDAL, ANNTHAPURAMU DISTRICT. 2. KAYAGURALA GAYATHRI, D/O SUDHAKAR, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, R/O H.NO.12-2-598, FLAT NO.502, K.C.NARAYANASWAMY NAGAR, ANANTAPURAMU, ANANTAPURAMU DISTRICT. 3. SANGA PRATHAP KUMAR, S/O SUDAHAKAR, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/O ANNEXURY, PROJECT COLONY, THUMMALAPENTA VILLAGE, KOLIMIGUNDLA MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT 4. SANGA SAI RAGHAVENDRA PRASAD, S/O SUDHAKAR, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/O H.NO.1-1702A, MUDIGUBBA VILLAGE AND MANDAL, SRI SATYASAI DISTRICT PETITIONERS NO.2 TO 4 ARE BROUGHT ON RECORD AS LRS OF DECEASED SOLE PETITIONER AS PER COURTS ORDER DT.20.02.2026 IN IA 1 OF 2022 ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT; STATE SECRETARIAT AT VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRDESH STATE 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, PENUKONDA DIVISION, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. STATE. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, MUDIGUBBA MANDAL, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate writ, or order or direction, more particularly, one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 4th respondent in trying to dispossess the petitioner from his patta land admeasuring Ac.2-20 Cents in Sy. No. 812/B1 and Ac.1-00 Cents in Sy. No. 812/B2, situated at Gunjepalli Village, Mudigubba Mandal, Ananthapuramu District, Andhra Pradesh State without issuing notice to the petitioner, for allotment of the said land to other landless poor persons, as highly illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional being violative of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and also violative of principles of natural justice, principles of promissory estoppel and doctrine of legitimate expectation and consequently direct the respondents not to issue house site pattas to any third parties in respect of the land admeasuring Ac.2-20 Cents in Sy. No. 812/B1 and Ac.1-00 Cents .in. Sy. No. 812/B1 and Ac.1-00 Cents .in. Sy. No. 812/B2, situated at Gunjepalli Village, Mudigubba Mandal, Ananthapuramu District, Andhra Pradesh State, belonging to the petitioner , in the interest of justice IA NO: 1 OF 2017(WPMP 44122 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to interfere with the peaceful physical possession of the petitioner in respect of land admeasuring Ac.2-20 Cents in Sy. No. 812/B1 and Ac.1-00 Cents in Sy. No. 812/B2, situated at Gunjepalli Village, Mudigubba Mandal, Ananthapuramu District, Andhra .Pradesh State, pending disposal of the writ petition IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to bring the Proposed Petitioners No. 2 to 5 here in on record as 3 Legal representatives of the deceased Writ Petitioner No.1 in W.P. No. 35531/2017 as petitioners No. 2 to 5 and in I.A.No.1/2017 and pass such other Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. K SRINIVAS 2. SUBBA RAO KORRAPATI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR ASSIGNMENT (AP) 2. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) The Court made the following: 4 The Court made the following ORDER: The 1st petitioner had moved W.P.No.35531 of 2017 alleging that the official respondents were seeking to dispossess him from an extent of Ac.2-20 cents of land in Sy.No.812/B1 and Ac.1-00 of land in Sy.No.812/B2 of Gunjepalli Village, Mudigubba Mandal, Ananthapuramu District despite the land is having been under D-form patta in the year 1985. 2. During pendency of the writ petition, the 1st petitioner died and the petitioners 2 to 4, who are the children of petitioner No.1 were brought on record, by way of an order of this Court, dated 20.02.2026. 3. The official respondents have not chosen to file counter-affidavit. However, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, appearing on behalf of the respondents, on instructions, submits that the official respondents have not sought to interfere with the possession of the petitioners over the said land. However, certain private personal appear to have laid basements for construction of houses. These houses were however, not completed and basement was only existing in the said land. 4. Recording the above submission, this Writ Petition is closed with a direction to the official respondents not to enter the said land, except in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J Date: 07.03.2026 KA 5 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 35531/2017 Date: 07.03.2026 KA