PUNIT KUMAR v. N.K.PANDEY, DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL, SHQ BSF
CCP(S)/306/2026 · 2026-09-08
Rajesh Sekhri
Writ Petition (Civil)body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2851 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2851 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Serial No. 52 Supplementary list
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
CCP(S) 306/2026 in
[WP(C) 1032/2026]
PUNIT KUMAR ….. Appellant/petitioner(s) Through: - Mr. Showkat Ahmad Dar, Advocate
V/s N.K.PANDEY, DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL, SHQ BSF
….. Respondent(s) Through: - Mr. Faizan Ahmad, CGSC
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR JUSTICE RAJESH SEKHRI, JUDGE
(ORDER) 08.09.2026
01. Learned counsel for the respondents has produced complete medical history of the petitioner, a perusal whereof reveals that petitioner is being regularly monitored and provided medical treatment as per the advice of the Doctors. He is stated to be mentally fit to stand trial and participate in the legal proceedings. As per the medical record, the psychiatric diagnosis of the petitioner cannot be construed as a mitigating factor or protective shield in relation to the ongoing legal process. Copy of the medical record is taken on record.
02. In view of the above, since order dated 11.05.2026, passed by this Court, directing the respondents to provide medical treatment to the petitioner, stands complied with.
03. Present petition is dismissed in limine.
(RAJESH SEKHRI)
JUDGE SRINAGAR 08.09.2026
“Mohammad Yasin Dar” Mohammad Yaseen Dar I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document