Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 28508 (PNJ)

AMANDEEP SINGH ALIAS AMAN AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER

CRM-M/18377/2026 · 2026-07-08

H S Grewal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-18377-2026 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh 281 CRM-M-18377-2026 Date of Decision: 08.07.2026 Amandeep Singh @ Aman and another ....Petitioners Vs. State of Punjab and another ...Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL Present: Mr. Vaibhav Narang, Advocate the petitioners. Mr. K.D.Sachdeva, DAG, Punjab. Mr. Manas Bhatia, Advocate for respondent No.2 **** H.S. GREWAL, J. (ORAL) 1. The present petition has been filed under Section 528 BNSS, 2023 praying for quashing of FIR No. 5 dated 22.01.2025 under Section 115(2), 333 and 3(5) (corresponding to Section 323, 452 and Section 34 of IPC 1860) registered at Police Station Kamboj, District Amritsar Rural (Annexure P/1), and all other consequential proceedings arising out of the aforesaid FIR on the basis of Compromise dated 20.03.2026 (Annexure P-2). 2. This Court vide order dated 07.04.2026 had directed the parties to appear before the trial Court to get their statements recorded and the learned Magistrate was directed to send its report qua the genuineness of the compromise. 3. Pursuant to the aforesaid order, parties have appeared before the learned JMIC, Amritsar and got their statements recorded. On the basis of the SONIA ARORA 2026.07.10 11:29 I agree to specified portions of this document CRM-M-18377-2026 2 statements so recorded, learned JMIC, Amritsar has submitted copy of report to the effect that he compromise has been effected between the parties voluntarily and without any coercion or undue influence. 4. Learned State counsel as well as learned counsel for the complainant have not disputed the factum of compromise between the parties. 5. In view of the above, no useful purpose would be served to continue with the proceedings before the trial Court in the instant FIR. 6. Following the principles laid down by the Full Bench judgment of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Versus State of Punjab and another 2007 (3) RCR (Criminal) 1052 and approved by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh Versus State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303, this petition is allowed and FIR No. 5 dated 22.01.2025 under Section 115(2), 333 and 3(5) (corresponding to Section 323, 452 and Section 34 of IPC 1860) registered at Police Station Kamboj, District Amritsar Rural (Annexure P/1), and all other consequential proceedings arising therefrom, are quashed, qua present petitioners on the basis of Compromise dated 20.03.2026 (Annexure P-2). 7. Pending applications, if any, shall also stand disposed of. (H.S.GREWAL) 08.07.2026 JUDGE sonia arora Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No SONIA ARORA 2026.07.10 11:29 I agree to specified portions of this document