SANDEEP KUMAR KESHRI @ SANDEEP KESHRI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./6586/2026 · 2026-10-05
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 28505 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 28505 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[ 2026:JHHC:29755] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.6586 of 2026
------ Sandeep Kumar Kehsri @ Sandeep Keshri, aged about 24 years, S/o Rajesh Prasad Keshri, R/o- Village- Kujju Behind Gitanjali Cinema, P.O. + P.S.- Mandu, District- Ramgarh. .... .... …. Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Nawin Kumar, Advocate. For the State
: Mr. Naveen Kr. Ganjhu, Addl.P.P.
------
Order No:-06 Dated:-05-10-2026
Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Ormanjhi P.S. Case No. 72 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 305 and 331(2) of the B.N.S., 2023.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner committed theft of belongings of the house of the informant. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false and petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. It is then submitted that petitioner has been implicated in this case only on the basis of his own confessional statement made in connection with Mandu (Kujju) P.S. Case No. 126 of 2025. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 29.05.2026 as mentioned in para-05 of the instant bail application. It is also submitted that the co-accused, with similar allegations, has already been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 10.04.2026 passed in B.A. No.2943 of 2026. Though charge-sheet has been submitted against the petitioner, but none of the witnesses have been examined in this case as yet. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released
on bail.
Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is
directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned J.M.F.C.-XVI, Ranchi in connection with Ormanjhi P.S. Case No. 72 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 05.10.2026 Amar/